From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D985E7EE49 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:57:59 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of lukstafi@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.220.177; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="lukstafi@gmail.com"; x-sender="lukstafi@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of lukstafi@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.177 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.220.177; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="lukstafi@gmail.com"; x-sender="lukstafi@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-vc0-f177.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.220.177; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="lukstafi@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-vc0-f177.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApABANHVMVLRVdyxm2dsb2JhbABbhBHAYoEUCBYOAQEBAQEGCwsJFCiCJQEBBAFAARsdAQMBCwYFBAEGDS4iAREBBQEcBhOHbwEDCQaeJ4xRgweEGwoZJw1kiFsBBQyPXweEHQOXeZAKGCmETDo X-IPAS-Result: ApABANHVMVLRVdyxm2dsb2JhbABbhBHAYoEUCBYOAQEBAQEGCwsJFCiCJQEBBAFAARsdAQMBCwYFBAEGDS4iAREBBQEcBhOHbwEDCQaeJ4xRgweEGwoZJw1kiFsBBQyPXweEHQOXeZAKGCmETDo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,891,1371074400"; d="scan'208";a="26637999" Received: from mail-vc0-f177.google.com ([209.85.220.177]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 12 Sep 2013 16:57:59 +0200 Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id gf12so7236943vcb.8 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 07:57:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=KJ2s3BTRaWjH/qQyilrnABgI25OV+6bC/A/Arg3FehA=; b=jU5Cdtn+CrOTXcXS0P3zUT9DsDObX5Md4khMtvbMTL97eQ4fwQNZZwdDhe7Jy2CmbJ YKANy5lOTqTk8dpgVMIP8Dr5CQ5LcJEzaVZN3OzylrQGiChpldKBypEDlzmPDzp+Ub4F rlYM1QOJZsOjuwnsuZjMBQafVkf8PXzq6B5fBu2woaFzUwHS2eFURjkTwyjj2i7n2Fpq DNvyEUyuGot62n5cfbdZ26Gsdkp8Jb78yVUpRT1QQhqRc3hTfJ7tPjoVfA1xoTpFWmSg HhgNQgJBRXlOx+XiukDEvhmSFEqrbJEXccCzsmJA7qAcYhOnMOPh3ZiRUnLwYZP3UEi7 CTYw== X-Received: by 10.221.6.195 with SMTP id ol3mr696739vcb.34.1378997878097; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 07:57:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.191.5 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 07:57:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5231D505.2020909@frisch.fr> References: <20130910230928.2d51cd39@atmarama.noip.me> <20130911052437.GA9514@notk.org> <20130911101457.3f756b68@atmarama.noip.me> <20130911181737.GA3764@notk.org> <054201ceaf2a$5a0ece10$0e2c6a30$@ffconsultancy.com> <05b701ceafc6$0dab7950$29026bf0$@ffconsultancy.com> <5231D505.2020909@frisch.fr> From: Lukasz Stafiniak Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:57:37 +0200 Message-ID: To: Alain Frisch Cc: Jon Harrop , Caml Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cbc8cab8ce404e630f66d Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options --089e013cbc8cab8ce404e630f66d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Alain Frisch wrote: > On 09/12/2013 04:40 PM, Jon Harrop wrote: > >> OCaml is nowhere near >> having competitive support for basic features required for modern GUI >> programming >> > > Hi Jon! > > Could you more specific? Are you referring to language features? > > I think he is referring to "intellisense", on which there has been a steady progress, but which is perhaps not yet easy to use out-of-the-box (there are multiple pieces that one has to integrate with one's toolchain and IDE, i.e. Emacs). --089e013cbc8cab8ce404e630f66d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Alain Frisch <alain@frisch= .fr> wrote:
On 09/12/2013 04:40 PM, Jon Harrop wrote:
OCaml is nowhere near
having competitive support for basic features required for modern GUI
programming

Hi Jon!

Could you more specific? =A0Are you referring to language features?


I think he is referring to "intellisense", on which the= re has been a steady progress, but which is perhaps not yet easy to use out= -of-the-box (there are multiple pieces that one has to integrate with one&#= 39;s toolchain and IDE, i.e. Emacs).
--089e013cbc8cab8ce404e630f66d--