From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D547D7F168 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:57:15 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:PqokjBPvBDKGViwDNkwl6mtUPXoX/o7sNwtQ0KIMzox0KPv9rarrMEGX3/hxlliBBdydsKIfzbSL+PiwEUU7or+/81k6OKRWUBEEjchE1ycBO+WiTXPBEfjxciYhF95DXlI2t1uyMExSBdqsLwaK+i760zceF13FOBZvIaytQ8iJ35/xib35o82bSj4LrQT+SIs6FA+xowTVu5teqqpZAYF19CH0pGBVcf9d32JiKAHbtR/94sCt4MwrqHwI6LoJvvRNWqTifqk+UacQTHF/azh0t4XXskzkSQqR62FUeGwQnhdMS1zC6BDkU43ZvCrgrfY72S/fN8DsSbEyHzivufRFUhjt3R0OMCM9uE3KicE42LhSpw+lqzRwxofVZMeeM/8oLfCVRs8TWWcUBpUZbCdGGI7pKtJXV+c= Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=raould@gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=raould@gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail-oi0-f43.google.com Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of raould@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.218.43; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="raould@gmail.com"; x-sender="raould@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of raould@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.43 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.218.43; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="raould@gmail.com"; x-sender="raould@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-oi0-f43.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.218.43; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="raould@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-oi0-f43.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DHCACNht9VnCvaVdFeg29pBrIki1UBBoF3hXuBNwc+DgEBAQEBAQEBEAEBAQEBBg0JCSEugh2CCAEDExEdARsdAQMBEQULDwIfBwIkAREBBQEiNYd2AQMKCA2jaYEvPjGLQIFsgnmKGgoZJw1WhEcBAQgCARkBAQQOgRSDPocBhQuCcIFDBY1hhESDGIUGh22ZFRIjgRcXglCBXh4zgk0BAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0DHCACNht9VnCvaVdFeg29pBrIki1UBBoF3hXuBNwc+DgEBAQEBAQEBEAEBAQEBBg0JCSEugh2CCAEDExEdARsdAQMBEQULDwIfBwIkAREBBQEiNYd2AQMKCA2jaYEvPjGLQIFsgnmKGgoZJw1WhEcBAQgCARkBAQQOgRSDPocBhQuCcIFDBY1hhESDGIUGh22ZFRIjgRcXglCBXh4zgk0BAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,423,1437429600"; d="scan'208";a="144009506" Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 27 Aug 2015 23:57:15 +0200 Received: by oibi18 with SMTP id i18so14661624oib.3 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:57:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=i/FB04b0VV2UysLsaavLkD0mLqRawqpgX1l0RZTy6kE=; b=bVopPM9wRTxWkSJDeaeo2WzabkryajhFv1ZZ907HjqEr/k+YxVrS7gzYVZuGuAaEEd 7brmr28pYA9Zw1hTDqYoCEdWlSb3AoOD9tJR/on2JOMzwZGmuIhlvBvnYwAG2o5aE5XP M5S9j7DweGpZuwzlr/7RI7OmFwXYJ87b5bhLOpO2muITkldr8IKkOb4XP2NwXseE1y/x a3n5h5vraQgr2sc4n/9R6kmFmOQC5JUF+NnaTGDIXKLrdzsyIjbMU4Mfj4TgCmiivNoh /Y29oFyRv2NrX6Jz2fNhtIUy5FVO5lKHteQcDiw0Y8Gsb1M7ghzQd0fkFh2rC4TeCWFL U+ZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.210.210 with SMTP id j201mr96252oig.118.1440712633721; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.172.36 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:57:13 -0700 Message-ID: From: Raoul Duke To: Oliver Bandel Cc: OCaml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: re: [Caml-list] option-type (was Re: We need a rich standard library distributed with OCaml, really) > It started me thinking about my code, seeing option-type not as > something strange, that sometimes makes sense, but as something, > which is really great and might be used more frequently ... yikes. here's hoping the dev world takes it to heart *some day* :-( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Hoare#cite_note-19