From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 797857F02D for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 20:02:46 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of raould@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.214.181; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="raould@gmail.com"; x-sender="raould@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of raould@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.181 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.214.181; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="raould@gmail.com"; x-sender="raould@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ob0-f181.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.214.181; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="raould@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ob0-f181.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkcBAM3HMlTRVda1m2dsb2JhbABfhDkEgn7QZQoCfggWAREBAQEBAQYLCwkULIQEAQEDARIRHQEbHgMBCwYFCw8CJgICIgERAQUBHAY1iAcBAwkIoFNuizCBcoMQh20KGScNZ4YiEgEFDoEejyCCd4FUBYtbkWOUDhgpg1GBYx0vgkoBAQE X-IPAS-Result: AkcBAM3HMlTRVda1m2dsb2JhbABfhDkEgn7QZQoCfggWAREBAQEBAQYLCwkULIQEAQEDARIRHQEbHgMBCwYFCw8CJgICIgERAQUBHAY1iAcBAwkIoFNuizCBcoMQh20KGScNZ4YiEgEFDoEejyCCd4FUBYtbkWOUDhgpg1GBYx0vgkoBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,664,1406584800"; d="scan'208";a="99658696" Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 06 Oct 2014 20:02:45 +0200 Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id wm4so4419194obc.12 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:02:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=EKCLzt8GlnSPu4iqcI4gX8SL2/+PrhVVTlkg9KbPRNQ=; b=bIlUbcORG1fWUY2gUD+LwNdSyEUVvMGBLLfQSDB4l3jFpBpAYg/Csf8bhvtAZe3xSy lNlCvC0CSxiApxASx98rDboa2ZK6i2uUkmEKhUgeWb2HvIZpsgW7aPAd6VhP55kpiOtx Bns65paA+aO6l71FC67AVU1qroJiNi5XOMoKGMraml7JcuW/imuJ2WVSQ5ZgGk1+K5qZ Pc+RCXgZN0XaSQmFE4GTvj1HOkXvNdViy0zPvfQmJ27EnYVJjKxcDW2rukQGaNt7BawI MHYpvsYsZ5KJitduYN9+utKCWqCOldIdbgIj0GkJyC7EwRwHDBaMAaBJvxH1QXKqrwwf hD0g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.96.225 with SMTP id dv1mr29568058obb.50.1412618564882; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.183.24.165 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 11:02:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 11:02:44 -0700 Message-ID: From: Raoul Duke To: OCaml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] JLAMP special issue on Open Problems in Concurrency Theory -- 2nd cfp > SPECIAL ISSUE ON OPEN PROBLEMS IN CONCURRENCY THEORY it is patently absurd to claim there are any closed problems in concurrency. oh, wait! this is only about *theory*. oh, well, then...