From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dofp.ocaml@gmail.com>
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CDE67ED26
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon,  4 Jun 2012 21:12:58 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjkBAPYHzU9KfVK2kGdsb2JhbABFtCcIIgEBAQEJCQ0HFAQjghgBAQEDARICExkBGx0BAwELBgULOyIBEQEFARwGNYdaAQMGBZhhCQOMIoJwhEoKGScNV4hxAQUMkRUDlRuJIIR5PoQB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,714,1330902000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="146537265"
Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 04 Jun 2012 21:12:57 +0200
Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so5118288wer.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=96SVNXL4goaA6qy2kya8IqxFdvLGwrApBrKAZjnM5lE=;
        b=Kw/9JiTtyEi+PEQLEBq/OEXZn86/wjGSlnkiOEAbv3VikezK4CJYe3Ob3CTtX/7lzd
         C3eSqwvymWJsOQ70JWwBzvCjZ+PuGDpUHaHYRubbNE+gdUEDPuD/m5/xnQzbqra8mhkB
         zC1ci9+rWr0pm0Npjx9L+9m79S+n9sOq7HNdXOTUppj7DyQKWigk8K8UPLbOojOzy56d
         yNpAuXnQfXJnd17GaZC4HXZTursR6j2aXTpNeNx53v/Hs+S+qrgrhHPeal0rKisuCjxf
         7CfJF7WZ5PYjyTo7mQDFulg6qvzo4VyM8LeCu12aeKHgnofFs86FA5DQMw6GcRF0Wwai
         YURw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.27.199 with SMTP id e49mr11827465wea.45.1338837177604;
 Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.238.139 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPFanBFj+6kZTRBnEN+6u6SgGXRPct0wwZqDLm=ch1M93-YZfg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHqiZ-+mJuOrtE03rftvrodxU4pfCfndQToJEHS0LRHa6Xwb-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPFanBFj+6kZTRBnEN+6u6SgGXRPct0wwZqDLm=ch1M93-YZfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 21:12:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHqiZ-+JbjgEkPPwPeZKgXEEqW7N-+1286wTvpJPVQweWiDzXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons <dofp.ocaml@gmail.com>
To: Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Puzzled by Scanf.Scanning.in_channel

    Gabriel,

> You should use bscanf:
>
> # Scanf.fscanf;;
> - : in_channel -> ('a, 'b, 'c, 'd) Scanf.scanner = <fun>
> # Scanf.bscanf;;
> - : Scanf.Scanning.in_channel -> ('a, 'b, 'c, 'd) Scanf.scanner = <fun>

Thanks. My I ask what is the difference between in_channel and
Scanf.Scanning.in_channel ?

        Diego Olivier