From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CE527EE80 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:26:32 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=74.125.82.169; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com"; x-sender="kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.82.169; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com"; x-sender="kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-we0-f169.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.125.82.169; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-we0-f169.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqoCAIv4RlFKfVKpgmdsb2JhbABDsxeSEIFRCBYOAQEUFBIGJIIkAQEFJxkBGxILAQMMBgULAwoNISEBAREBBQEKEgYTEodvAQMPDKM6jDKCe4QaChknAwpZiHwBBQyMQIJJB4NAA4hvhVeGOIFggR+KSYM4FimEMjc X-IPAS-Result: AqoCAIv4RlFKfVKpgmdsb2JhbABDsxeSEIFRCBYOAQEUFBIGJIIkAQEFJxkBGxILAQMMBgULAwoNISEBAREBBQEKEgYTEodvAQMPDKM6jDKCe4QaChknAwpZiHwBBQyMQIJJB4NAA4hvhVeGOIFggR+KSYM4FimEMjc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,863,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="8100238" Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 18 Mar 2013 12:26:32 +0100 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so4844667wey.0 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:26:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=88sVxAG2m126wl9VtSnfC9RXKgdmm5lHnPHVOI0refo=; b=TwQDJetG26xEkpYNmKQ5bqahmiG/jnEePFFh1XaOg+g7UomGgfDSVIIRuLWFaJGF9r Kmcfn8pIrc81RtWbulDNDXCR6y8Y6KEU0OYMoD+pozJWMVzthdVfRZFowlGsgVlOMtUz nvEJsfG8CQZurK3JHQoB+3ZoXE8h5D/VqPBi9Qyqq281RiXcu7bAxNUfmBjPcjnVhRQB tZiewK//XfeoHDP2xKDZ3uAGM32kzOeZzg7BiwYRoAPz/t/f3Lriu8y4HJSpMe8LK0WS RgKHcnlS+xH+azjuA5EcNx9rQChi1m5Z2zWsceT5yHZt0CH0JZHJ60PPUTsF5NzBri/r s3qA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.103.72 with SMTP id fu8mr24063397wjb.42.1363605991850; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.104.134 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:26:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878v5lca2c.fsf@li195-236.members.linode.com> References: <86572c5b-3307-4f6f-be0b-c710b6291780@googlegroups.com> <878v5lca2c.fsf@li195-236.members.linode.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:26:31 +0400 Message-ID: From: Kakadu To: Malcolm Matalka Cc: fa.caml@googlegroups.com, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Haskell vs OCaml Please, don't feed the troll On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Malcolm Matalka wrote: > The biggest advantage for me is Ocaml is simpler than Haskell IMO. > > adrian.alexander.may@gmail.com writes: > >> On Wednesday, 13 August 2008 20:49:17 UTC+8, circ ular wrote: >>> What are the advantages/disadvantages when comparing OCaml to Haskell? >> >> case you of >> man -> haskell >> mouse -> ocaml > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs