From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7C707ED34 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:11:28 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of deliverable@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.214.182; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="deliverable@gmail.com"; x-sender="deliverable@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of deliverable@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.214.182; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="deliverable@gmail.com"; x-sender="deliverable@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ob0-f182.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.214.182; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="deliverable@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ob0-f182.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwDAL8S+k/RVda2kGdsb2JhbABFtjMBA4EfCCIBAQEBCQkNBxQEI4IhAQEEEgIsARseAwwGBQs7IgERAQUBHDuHWwEDDJwCCQOMI4Jxg3gKGScNV4hxAQUMi2NYgWmDHAOISYxtjig+hB4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,548,1336341600"; d="scan'208";a="150003450" Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 09 Jul 2012 01:11:27 +0200 Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so32824938obb.27 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 16:11:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=WbRCrfbM1pZzI0gN10pBTofJ7uN/QWPg44FW68IyjQI=; b=EZ5di3CH8urAF993cpeye+4nwxLlxWaoxhN4LBFzq33R/xdqOEI4aW/iE9RfeGYVW9 OQfacwQGnc9sA+3XquWueKKX/zrEyYaO7ULupQBDPY3KGpGFF2SwbWme4AyhKJC3jsgA 49F8dfNPFoZ0fJyhR4O12sXmnaPl+q3FQZr7BfTFEf6Mq+iy1IUroC9dxF27cRCfgba7 99KScBCezeKo6ro5stIIR7xSAXZHcr7apSQXPdnicz2c8Lg1tOug9kuZb8L0h9ri5cLC /uxiysTwPC+OYJ80JZEjVhh64EI46o/iq7HdhcZTVrVu2yppKrFVNrLIC9CxO6V6EW+5 CFfg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.45.197 with SMTP id p5mr6993610igm.73.1341789086298; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 16:11:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.55.166 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:11:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120707120210.GA32096@annexia.org> References: <15AA452B-980F-45C2-9DDD-21E0993ACDE5@inria.fr> <20120706131531.GA12737@annexia.org> <4FF7DF55.7080201@inria.fr> <20120707120210.GA32096@annexia.org> Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:11:26 -0700 Message-ID: From: Alexy Khrabrov To: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] 4.00.0 is coming I wonder whether lacking true concurrency is a bug and whether this is being fixed? :) Sorry just've been away for a bit but am keen on seeing it "fixed" one day! A+