Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yaron Minsky <yminsky@janestreet.com>
To: "Török Edwin" <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net>
Cc: "caml-list@inria.fr" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] UFO (United Forces of OCaml)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:04:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACLX4jSjSO-s0ATTUdDSpWoM=-Amzw1jVwUBSLuExY8LcCUnKg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524569E1.20701@etorok.net>

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Török Edwin <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net> wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 10:11 AM, Gour wrote:
>>
>> However, there are certain things which seems like wasting of resources,
>> so my humble proposal is whether it is possible to make UFO - United
>> Forces of OCaml in order not to have too many (similar) projects
>> tackling the same problems.
>
> I think this is worked on under the name "OCaml Platform":
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/projects/ocamllabs/tasks/platform.html
>
>> So, my naive proposal is to try to combine forces together and produce
>> small(er) set of tools libraries and make it somewhat 'standard' within
>> community.
>
> I'd prefer if existing tools are improved, and the best one considered as "standard",
> rather than developing a new set of tools to replace all the existing ones.
> As you noticed we have too many alternatives already, and if yet another one is created we'll end up with: http://xkcd.com/927/

I very much agree.  The problem of having too many libraries isn't
solved by a vote or by creating Yet Another Library.  It's solved by
one of the alternatives getting good enough that people migrate to it
of their own accord.  I'm hopeful that the work we're doing on Core
and its related libraries will get it there, but whether it does or
not is a question for people to vote on with their feet (or with their
fingers, I suppose.)

y

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-27 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-27  7:11 Gour
2013-09-27 11:20 ` Török Edwin
2013-09-27 12:04   ` Yaron Minsky [this message]
2013-09-27 12:15     ` Paolo Donadeo
2013-09-27 15:55       ` David MENTRE
2013-09-27 16:25         ` Siraaj Khandkar
2013-09-27 16:45           ` Ashish Agarwal
2013-09-27 12:13   ` Gour
2013-09-27 11:25 ` Lukasz Stafiniak
2013-09-30  1:40 ` Francois Berenger
2013-09-30  6:01   ` Gour
2013-09-30  6:33     ` Francois Berenger
2013-09-30 14:14   ` Sylvain Le Gall
2013-09-27 17:08 Damien Guichard
2013-09-27 18:58 ` Gour

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACLX4jSjSO-s0ATTUdDSpWoM=-Amzw1jVwUBSLuExY8LcCUnKg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=yminsky@janestreet.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox