From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david.mentre@gmail.com>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C303F7EE4B
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:56:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  david.mentre@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=209.85.215.53;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="david.mentre@gmail.com";
  x-sender="david.mentre@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  david.mentre@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.53 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.215.53;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="david.mentre@gmail.com";
  x-sender="david.mentre@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-la0-f53.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.215.53;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="david.mentre@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-la0-f53.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjUCAGOqRVLRVdc1m2dsb2JhbABahBGCY758CBYOAQEBAQEGCwsJFCiCJgEFQAE4AQMMAQUFCwM4HwIBEgEFARwGEwiHbAMPm2+PXIQvJw2JZAEFDIxagRyFdgOOTYdJgWmMRINKGCmBYoJtOg
X-IPAS-Result: AjUCAGOqRVLRVdc1m2dsb2JhbABahBGCY758CBYOAQEBAQEGCwsJFCiCJgEFQAE4AQMMAQUFCwM4HwIBEgEFARwGEwiHbAMPm2+PXIQvJw2JZAEFDIxagRyFdgOOTYdJgWmMRINKGCmBYoJtOg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,994,1371074400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="34652333"
Received: from mail-la0-f53.google.com ([209.85.215.53])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 27 Sep 2013 17:56:05 +0200
Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id el20so2352600lab.12
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=ObMUlL0J4WwekexAndZB2Ivsbh5qgDtZzqN3ZaJWQ80=;
        b=xEQrc3CWNxH/1UQl7Fq43kO2J/XcuOEHzuLIQgKavEMEEAU2KlgTBaTX9Rsm9KpH8i
         V1OIgmtiFHZ9YYPZW8D8dHcBFp6imdlQzBaZQhI8Hj6Wvc1EYdowFV28xd0FElBHJvmI
         KH/4Xbpp6Av24H20AKATdDxge28eGRBwjhAMAKy2QlRLuFo0QxSHlphIBm5RSr7PmhGx
         JAphmfArE2aTRnTMoVxwL2Uu/q/oWeEAGrZIkWLDzwPMQLJhDLR8thocv9kjI+i6JCOn
         r4057+RnV+CjymdArHQr11dRysWqhHk2MPeu6m4HqCeJgE+KFoXIetvIvrnDWXqVjobz
         QoeA==
X-Received: by 10.112.64.36 with SMTP id l4mr9039143lbs.15.1380297365687; Fri,
 27 Sep 2013 08:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: david.mentre@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.45.108 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPzAKVBkwvS6a4kNfLgZNCbkQKOyjHJkquL+d_XYE6A4+TB_sg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130927091146.54ef8c42@atmarama.noip.me> <524569E1.20701@etorok.net>
 <CACLX4jSjSO-s0ATTUdDSpWoM=-Amzw1jVwUBSLuExY8LcCUnKg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPzAKVBkwvS6a4kNfLgZNCbkQKOyjHJkquL+d_XYE6A4+TB_sg@mail.gmail.com>
From: David MENTRE <dmentre@linux-france.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:55:35 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: cOyIE2pU1zyExf_MPrDt7QTmSbo
Message-ID: <CAC3Lx=Z+peti1nEoJbh0kp2WdB_iMnvhjLfbv9mwoYBcSOeO9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paolo Donadeo <p.donadeo@gmail.com>
Cc: OCaml mailing list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] UFO (United Forces of OCaml)

Hello,

2013/9/27 Paolo Donadeo <p.donadeo@gmail.com>:
> But, regarding the specific case of the
> "extended library", there aren't many libraries, but only two:
> Batteries and Core. And I think both of them have very strong points,
> and the design is quite different.

Is there a short document somewhere explaining those design differences?

Best regards,
david