From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yallop@gmail.com>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A38BE7FCCB
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:30:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  yallop@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.220.178;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="yallop@gmail.com";
  x-sender="yallop@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  yallop@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.178 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.220.178;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="yallop@gmail.com";
  x-sender="yallop@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
  x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-qk0-f178.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.220.178;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="yallop@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-qk0-f178.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AwAgAtKz5VlLLcVdFchDsFgxXDLYdWAoEpBzoSAQEBAQEBAREBAQEBBwsLCR8whCEBAQQSER0BGx0BAwwGBQsDCgICJgICIgERAQUBHAYTCBqHdAEDEaYAPjGLOYFrgnaIYgoZJw1VhGwBAQEBAQUBAQEBARcBBQ6BE4oXhQUHgmiBRQWcDpQXEiOBDAmEGD0xgkQBAQE
X-IPAS-Result: A0AwAgAtKz5VlLLcVdFchDsFgxXDLYdWAoEpBzoSAQEBAQEBAREBAQEBBwsLCR8whCEBAQQSER0BGx0BAwwGBQsDCgICJgICIgERAQUBHAYTCBqHdAEDEaYAPjGLOYFrgnaIYgoZJw1VhGwBAQEBAQUBAQEBARcBBQ6BE4oXhQUHgmiBRQWcDpQXEiOBDAmEGD0xgkQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,656,1422918000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="137761255"
Received: from mail-qk0-f178.google.com ([209.85.220.178])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 27 Apr 2015 14:30:56 +0200
Received: by qkx62 with SMTP id 62so60856006qkx.0
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 05:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=jKbLuWF7jer/hsAkOyWffbfmBXVz50KiVuvImbAAUy0=;
        b=soS1Ee5rBFkESbQpxydcC/x1hPjzN2Z1HEcypNfqJpYz8uvzZ/njjx7cEHDHIAaUkR
         DeB5aNJtv38nO6MVwM0q4Fb5frUI/ad85B4o5YfqO0N1pupERz3rWrhodYMQVzUt5oak
         D5eyeW/VxYlT2CH7L21eCxsppDinG8SHcFU320g3RRM0o+olIGelT1QaGGOOCUmrTM9I
         yJ0ln0b3i72lMl+3LjPEVFGbx/0w5IH1Ody4qEQmi2+EhBsomZmC+wsQvTMJAtgyHbhC
         5SoqCr4upunCsMp8mVCfEFYrulxhMoS/B0Yw7859CkJZAL7iB6y72cesYVnGE6omvpeK
         SsgA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.108.201 with SMTP id j67mr6965163qgf.79.1430137854969;
 Mon, 27 Apr 2015 05:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.40.7 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 05:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL2Z3DAga4ZzhCJga+jns3MXZh4g44ALd=JSgOeDQEf678zToQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL2Z3DBbmv+4e+r7_9Bhbqx2yNhOXHxumxZWc1rGySb6Sr4tug@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAxsn=GiUeB17MWJVaLcu-=2E2kzP3R2cmdHR_BiEPb1Q1gu+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+mHimOLF3fCgkwQ9ObwmfHexQzoqi75VzVHFJuueebjC56D2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL2Z3DAga4ZzhCJga+jns3MXZh4g44ALd=JSgOeDQEf678zToQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:30:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAxsn=FomDwmm=2RO3gGsN9ZirB4XE2POzZ9LxcefqFzDG1kfw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeremy Yallop <yallop@gmail.com>
To: Jiten Pathy <jpathy@fssrv.net>
Cc: Stephen Dolan <stephen.dolan@cl.cam.ac.uk>, "caml-list@inria.fr" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] phantom type

On 27 April 2015 at 13:17, Jiten Pathy <jpathy@fssrv.net> wrote:
> It seems this encoding using first-class modules has overheads in the
> interpreter(due to the functor), whereas the gadt implementation would
> have no overheads.

Have you measured it?