From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD0C07F614 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:04:09 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=yallop@gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=yallop@gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail-qk0-f179.google.com Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of yallop@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.220.179; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="yallop@gmail.com"; x-sender="yallop@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of yallop@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.179 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.220.179; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="yallop@gmail.com"; x-sender="yallop@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-qk0-f179.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.220.179; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="yallop@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-qk0-f179.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A2xIV3hYVL+XtkDNWfIc/aq//LSx+4OfEezUN459i?= =?us-ascii?q?sYplN5qZpsW+bnLW6fgltlLVR4KTs6sC0LuP9f+6EjFfqdbZ6TZZL8wKD0dEwe?= =?us-ascii?q?wt3CUeQ+e9QXXhK/DrayFoVO9jb3RCu0+BDE5OBczlbEfTqHDhpRQbGxH4KBYn?= =?us-ascii?q?br+tQt2a3IyL0LWO/JibWQREizf1Na91KVO06x/QusYbwo9jMboZxRzOrX9Ffu?= =?us-ascii?q?1XwSVjIlfFzDjm4cLl3pN5/iFB88Mo88pHSe2ubq08SbtAJDsjOmExosbssE+Q?= =?us-ascii?q?HkO0+nIAXzBOwVJzCA/f4USiUw=3D=3D?= X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DHAQDoSdlXf7PcVdFUCRoBAQEBAgEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEIAQEBARcBAQQBAQoBAYMPAQEBAQF1fAese4tWggMZB4V+AoFGBzoSAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQESAQEJCwsJFzGCMhiCGAEBBAECDxEEGQEbHQEDDAYFCw0CAiYCAiIBE?= =?us-ascii?q?QEFARwGEyKIDQEDFw6he4EyPjKLPYFrgl4Fg28KGScNU4JWAQEBAQEFAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?aAgEFEHaJeoJDgVaDKYJaBZlohiWJL4FYjgqMW4I5Ex6BESUJgxiBeDs0AYZTA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DHAQDoSdlXf7PcVdFUCRoBAQEBAgEBAQEIAQEBARcBAQQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQoBAYMPAQEBAQF1fAese4tWggMZB4V+AoFGBzoSAQEBAQEBAQEBAQESAQEJC?= =?us-ascii?q?wsJFzGCMhiCGAEBBAECDxEEGQEbHQEDDAYFCw0CAiYCAiIBEQEFARwGEyKIDQE?= =?us-ascii?q?DFw6he4EyPjKLPYFrgl4Fg28KGScNU4JWAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEaAgEFEHaJeoJDg?= =?us-ascii?q?VaDKYJaBZlohiWJL4FYjgqMW4I5Ex6BESUJgxiBeDs0AYZTAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,333,1470693600"; d="scan'208";a="236439434" Received: from mail-qk0-f179.google.com ([209.85.220.179]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 14 Sep 2016 15:04:09 +0200 Received: by mail-qk0-f179.google.com with SMTP id h8so12314926qka.1 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:04:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+5h8uVEAHJuSRMsHA85xnQOIT2Lwmv1CxIO5hN/5AvQ=; b=FPYF76iGIJUd5p/MSORETlXihQFsDcJ783YXDaolqQe8ECtUSnkD42UeLt7cdkgz6b 5apHEk5BFX/hPoFohac3AClJ6/c1yYp03cobIHpZBlzMqMzb4CyNZQF7ETK1xph7U32A b5STME8IcCiIitSZTfC+6D0N82Q77/c5yhUjWaIeynTfJ0eBRQIDwhYY+2BVF34npFuV CaCEzHfRdNkR1EIezs1xh2J66qL991B+i1wfaowbiyh7Po4/jMc5Sg7MrP7mZTV18+AY 3Fslz0y+McquFr5BgVrZ9zCNrO1/irei0ePzimAQ4cfcD948mxQCDh+7m8b6QBIEL3RA HAFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+5h8uVEAHJuSRMsHA85xnQOIT2Lwmv1CxIO5hN/5AvQ=; b=RWBwjrkkZDO3Dqrd9cdg63GVHIhc+jVWZ41untqwBmU4Y8mJ7HNapeXKuUcZyQka4X clJdArYVfei3rm72SRC4Rn4Y0NiA1Dzq9fDTQizfDjLv3fWC6XANe0RqPsDXnNANLbNf OcJLXB0lsNkYWE39KyF3ZIFAdsykCod3v8oD3K3ylOmrOoXTWEa9tz2t4f0ou1zdxzey 2GhjLVlbC5kVTyLvGZ7KfaC7AFrHoKlCR/FATny0KtlodtFO2krhJ1LqgmRAglq8cAn9 TMYxO/8fcUzfhdLjdhq7stagCcXFw38t4Wi9hq4R3phu51E61vATPOoZBaOTgMKsvNkC LhSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPaRMDklpcA4lrof7API8/vpe4JGh8oEB5Cgp479aDwHtEnoQ7HStyYdXNXpXx8Be1Qdhk09B2MaDJlmA== X-Received: by 10.55.157.11 with SMTP id g11mr2866367qke.207.1473858247728; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:04:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.152.199 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:04:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jeremy Yallop Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:04:06 +0100 Message-ID: To: Tom Ridge Cc: David Allsopp , caml-list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Comment syntax? On 14 September 2016 at 13:51, Tom Ridge wrote: > In this case, has there been any progress on "single line" comments Yes: there's a recent concrete proposal, and a few (mostly multi-line) comments on it here: https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/671 > // some comment That would be backwards-incompatible, unfortunately. For example, the following program let f ( // ) = ( // ) currently defines f as the polymorphic identity function, but with the addition of '//' comments it would instead define a function of type 'unit -> unit'.