From: Benjamin Greenman <blg59@cornell.edu>
Cc: Kenichi Asai <asai@is.ocha.ac.jp>, Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Labels at the module level?
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 04:46:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAtAoRoeDcKr2LU0Z=nS6k6FXab=SnOGaMy4XHX+Nkh1R2g68w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAxsn=Gf+Kp+K+OBF65N_6CN4Lf1v-4WC0harO8jUhj0eb46hA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2113 bytes --]
Instead of making a functor, you could try a first-class module:
module type Person = sig
val name : string
val age : int
end
let make_person ?(name="anon") (age : int) : (module Person) =
(module struct
let name = name
let age = age
end)
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Jeremy Yallop <yallop@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23 June 2015 at 09:26, Kenichi Asai <asai@is.ocha.ac.jp> wrote:
> > Using labeled arguments, one can supply default values for unspecified
> > arguments:
> >
> > let f ?(x = 3) y = x * y
> > in f 5
> >
> > will return 15 without specifying the value of x at the second line.
> > Is there a way to do a similar thing at the module level? Namely, I
> > want to define a functor that accepts a module of sig:
> >
> > module type A_t = sig
> > val x : int
> > val y : int
> > end
> >
> > but if the user did not specify some of the values in the signature,
> > some default values will be used.
> >
> > Background: in the universe library for OCaml:
> >
> > http://pllab.is.ocha.ac.jp/~asai/Universe/
> >
> > one specifies various handlers for events (such as tick, mouse, and
> > key events). Currently, these handlers are registered to the big_bang
> > function that accepts them using labeled arguments (with default
> > values). I wonder if I can specify the interface as a module
> > signature and let the user write a module of that signature but only
> > those handlers that the user is interested in.
>
> Alain Frisch once had a patch to add exactly what you're asking for as
> a language feature:
>
> http://alain.frisch.fr/soft.html#patches (Scroll to 'optional
> fields in modules')
> http://alain.frisch.fr/info/patch-option-announce
>
> In the absence of such a feature, one approach is to use 'include' to
> provide the defaults:
>
> module M
> include M_defaults
> let y = 3
> end
>
> Jeremy.
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3927 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-23 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-23 8:26 Kenichi Asai
2015-06-23 8:43 ` Jeremy Yallop
2015-06-23 8:46 ` Benjamin Greenman [this message]
2015-06-24 0:25 ` Kenichi Asai
2015-06-26 8:12 ` Ben Millwood
2015-06-23 8:50 Oleg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAtAoRoeDcKr2LU0Z=nS6k6FXab=SnOGaMy4XHX+Nkh1R2g68w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=blg59@cornell.edu \
--cc=asai@is.ocha.ac.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox