From: Taylor Venable <taylor@metasyntax.net>
To: Jerome Vouillon <vouillon@pps.jussieu.fr>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Problem with un-flushed output getting mangled
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:55:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAmKFxcSWWMsLk7MuOQsin9OxxXFOGaaJHj33c25m61ccoMA2A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110930094501.GA24085@pps.jussieu.fr>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 05:45, Jerome Vouillon <vouillon@pps.jussieu.fr> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:00:47PM -0400, Taylor Venable wrote:
>> My trouble is this: if I fail to call flush on the output channels in
>> step #4, I get mangled output. By mangled I mean that in the middle of
>> one line, suddenly the data from another line appears. The other line
>> exists elsewhere in the output. Sometimes lines are simply duplicated.
>
> Are you using Unix.fork? When you fork, the buffers are duplicated and
> can thus end up being flushed several times. In particular, the 'exit'
> function from the Pervasives module flushes all open output channels.
> I don't have a good workaround. You can call 'flush_all' before
> forking, but any write error is silently ignored by this function.
> Or use 'Unix.execv "/bin/true" [||]' rather than 'exit' to terminate
> subprocesses.
Nope, I'm not forking. I also tried putting an explicit exit at the
end of my program, but I already close_out my file before then so it
doesn't make a difference. Thanks for the ideas, though.
--
Taylor C. Venable
http://metasyntax.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-01 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-30 0:00 Taylor Venable
2011-09-30 9:45 ` Jerome Vouillon
2011-10-01 1:55 ` Taylor Venable [this message]
2011-10-01 7:11 ` Török Edwin
2011-10-03 10:51 ` Taylor Venable
2011-10-02 11:41 ` Tiphaine Turpin
[not found] ` <CAGyUfm24stnWFHwWGt4p0gZWA72FM97aXUZTe7wo1i9WDj7nFA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-10-03 19:00 ` Pierre Chopin
2011-10-04 1:39 ` Taylor Venable
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAmKFxcSWWMsLk7MuOQsin9OxxXFOGaaJHj33c25m61ccoMA2A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=taylor@metasyntax.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=vouillon@pps.jussieu.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox