From: Berke Durak <berke.durak@gmail.com>
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] Why is some code compiled with 4.04.0 or 4.05.0 running 2.3 times slower than the same code compiled with 4.03.0?
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 23:42:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAALTfKCF1TRznq43rE04VmHRX-zzSEDEapvFgyeiqUq63Jyw1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1303 bytes --]
I compiled and ran a simple matrix-multiplication-style benchmark program
written in imperative style with Bigarrays (see below) using versions
4.01.0, 4.03.0, 4.03.0+flambda, 4.04.0+trunk+flambda (with -version
4.04.0+dev9-2015-09-05), 4.04.0+beta2+flambda (4.04.0+beta2) and
4.05+trunk+flambda (4.05.0+dev0-2016-08-01).
Execution time increased by a factor of 2.3 from 4.03+flambda to
4.04+trunk+flambda. I tried a few of the newer optimization switches
(-rounds X, -unboxed-types, -unbox-closures, etc.) but that didn't make a
significant difference.
Execution times, repeatable within ~5%:
4.01.0 5.45s
4.03.0 4.28s
4.03.0+flambda 4.44s
4.04.0+trunk+flambda 10.45s
4.04.0+beta2+flambda 10.72s
4.05.0+trunk+flambda 10.36s
The test program was:
open Bigarray
let _ =
let m, n, rep = 100, 100, 1000 in
let cr m n = Array2.create float64 fortran_layout m n in
let a = cr m n in
let c = cr m m in
let rz = ref 0.0 in
let x = ref 0.0 in
for r = 1 to rep do
for i = 1 to m do
for j = 1 to n do
a.{i,j} <- !rz;
rz := !rz +. 123.45;
done
done;
for i = 1 to m do
for j = 1 to m do
x := 0.0;
for k = 1 to n do
x := !x +. a.{i,k} *. a.{k,i}
done;
c.{i,j} <- !x
done
done
done
--
Berke Durak, VA7OBD (CN88)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2378 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-30 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-30 6:42 Berke Durak [this message]
2016-10-30 16:49 ` David Allsopp
2016-10-31 7:37 ` Mark Shinwell
2016-10-31 23:16 ` Berke Durak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAALTfKCF1TRznq43rE04VmHRX-zzSEDEapvFgyeiqUq63Jyw1A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=berke.durak@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox