From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C8257F75C for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 05:59:39 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of trigger0219@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.216.179; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="trigger0219@gmail.com"; x-sender="trigger0219@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of trigger0219@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.216.179; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="trigger0219@gmail.com"; x-sender="trigger0219@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-qc0-f179.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.216.179; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="trigger0219@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-qc0-f179.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcCAKeRI1TRVdizlGdsb2JhbABgg2FXBIJ9tgaPWIFvh0yBBAgWAREBAQEBBwsLCRIthAMBAQEDARIRBBkBGxILAQMBCwEFBQsNDRoDAgIhAQERAQUBCgERBgESEhCIBwEDCQgNoU5uizCBcoMQiS4KGScDCmaGOxEBBQ6KHINEgiyDA4FTBYUTBY1LgzWEeYIQgWGNLYRUGCmBbINDIS8BgkkBAQE X-IPAS-Result: AgcCAKeRI1TRVdizlGdsb2JhbABgg2FXBIJ9tgaPWIFvh0yBBAgWAREBAQEBBwsLCRIthAMBAQEDARIRBBkBGxILAQMBCwEFBQsNDRoDAgIhAQERAQUBCgERBgESEhCIBwEDCQgNoU5uizCBcoMQiS4KGScDCmaGOxEBBQ6KHINEgiyDA4FTBYUTBY1LgzWEeYIQgWGNLYRUGCmBbINDIS8BgkkBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,594,1406584800"; d="scan'208";a="97751940" Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 25 Sep 2014 05:59:37 +0200 Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id l6so3976414qcy.38 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:59:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=RhhVDoQrcrZRt4iqEa39YFfTcAjGaYaNGZOw6keKNmo=; b=ObrZc4FIywP3DA0yD8ZJLRdyV5LdlUBrYVjSpMlo/GVoQ8fmBTzc0TKJ1Vn4G+5ggY 2PeVq35IzkrCy9ns4xcUxOqfwDhFp/xQOz6xNkm6OU/LV8lPhdaks9GvzAhJTJ8eEEsE B2BA545oOLpa/DbeS5ujYtS4prSFKCuhwLcuPJK6ifOhDAvKlVKcI3GaRM83xXCmZV8w BAUCNtMZKnQnAhHI3NA1bNSFiTR/b51S0cBGVIzP2IbYCDPK3MlfHfOmClA4lInq/Csh 45YeCZq4X8ljDGbfTaNCMW8+Eo5Q4P+v6Rvby2/Qs9l9E7Sbe4YTcIlrADzZxv2z7glN 48AQ== X-Received: by 10.224.137.3 with SMTP id u3mr4961251qat.82.1411617576936; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:59:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: trigger0219@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.91.69 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:58:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <87r3z2720e.fsf@comtv.ru> From: Nick Lucaroni Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:58:56 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: zuCOSP1zlmdqyQDnPFGhaoUvbeU Message-ID: To: av1474 , caml-list@inria.fr Cc: Damien Doligez Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2bbfe3b6ecb0503dbd452 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml 4.02.1 is coming soon --001a11c2bbfe3b6ecb0503dbd452 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I forgot we had been using some magic to convert strings. that's the price we pay. nick On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Nick Lucaroni < nicholas.r.lucaroni@gmail.com> wrote: > Are the formatting issues resolved in the 4.02.0+turnk switch in OPAM > (that's, dev0-2014-08-29)? I'm getting segmentation faults from fprintf in > my application even in that branch (see below). I'll work to pin it down as > it very well could be a miss-formatted string on my part, but obviously we > shouldn't seg-fault. let me know if I should hold off. > > thanks, > nick > > Time: 48706621 - pc: 98976 - module CamlinternalFormat > 1375 fun k o acc fmt -> <|b|>match fmt with > > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:08 PM, wrote: > >> Damien Doligez writes: >> >> > Dear OCaml users, >> > >> > The rather large amount of changes in the newly released 4.02 >> > inevitably caused some issues in the very first minor release. We >> > shall have a 4.02.1 bugfix release coming soon, hopefully in early >> > October. >> > >> > Among the few issues that have now been fixed, there are a few >> > regressions in the new, type-safe format implementation >> > (Printf/Scanf/Format) -- for advanced formatting features. >> > >> > There was also a regression in the *compilation time* of the >> > distributed OCaml compiler, which is sensibly slower than 4.01 on >> > multi-module programs. This is already fixed in the development >> > version of the compiler and will be part of the bugfix release. >> > >> >> Compilation of [1] skyrocketed (at least here on rather oldish PPC >> machine), hopfully things would be a bit better in 4.02.1. >> >> > Any additional testing to find and report other regressions is more >> > than welcome. If you have not yet tested your programs with 4.02, now >> > is the time to give it a try! >> > >> > >> > -- Damien >> >> [1] >> http://repo.or.cz/w/llpp.git/blob/53f1bca0140d03d9f2e1437a4ad0dbc3f7e85ce0:/main.ml >> -- >> mailto:av1474@comtv.ru >> >> -- >> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: >> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list >> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners >> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >> > > --001a11c2bbfe3b6ecb0503dbd452 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I forgot we had been using some magic to convert strings. = that's the price we pay.

nick

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:50= PM, Nick Lucaroni <nicholas.r.lucaroni@gmail.com> wrote:
Are the formatting issues resolved in the 4.02.0+turnk switch = in OPAM (that's, dev0-2014-08-29)? I'm getting segmentation faults = from fprintf in my application even in that branch (see below). I'll wo= rk to pin it down as it very well could be a miss-formatted string on my pa= rt, but obviously we shouldn't seg-fault. let me know if I should hold = off.

t= hanks,
nick

Time: 4870= 6621 - pc: 98976 - module CamlinternalFormat
1375 fun k o acc fmt -> <|b|>match fmt with
=



= On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:08 PM, <av1474@comtv.ru> wrote:
Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr> writes:

> Dear OCaml users,
>
> The rather large amount of changes in the newly released 4.02
> inevitably caused some issues in the very first minor release. We
> shall have a 4.02.1 bugfix release coming soon, hopefully in early
> October.
>
> Among the few issues that have now been fixed, there are a few
> regressions in the new, type-safe format implementation
> (Printf/Scanf/Format) -- for advanced formatting features.
>
> There was also a regression in the *compilation time* of the
> distributed OCaml compiler, which is sensibly slower than 4.01 on
> multi-module programs. This is already fixed in the development
> version of the compiler and will be part of the bugfix release.
>

Compilation of [1] skyrocketed (at least here on rather oldish PPC
machine), hopfully things would be a bit better in 4.02.1.

> Any additional testing to find and report other regressions is more
> than welcome. If you have not yet tested your programs with 4.02, now<= br> > is the time to give it a try!
>
>
> -- Damien

[1] http://repo.or.cz/w/llpp.git/blo= b/53f1bca0140d03d9f2e1437a4ad0dbc3f7e85ce0:/main.ml
--
mailto:av1474@comtv.ru=

--
Caml-list mailing list.=C2=A0 Subscription management and archives:
ht= tps://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs


--001a11c2bbfe3b6ecb0503dbd452--