From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B73A67FC18 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:22:47 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of stedolan@stedolan.net) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.215.48; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-sender="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of stedolan@stedolan.net) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.215.48; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-sender="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-la0-f48.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.215.48; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-la0-f48.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CbAQC1NOJUlDDXVdFbhDIEgn/GPwdDAQEBAQEBEAEBAQEHCwsJEjCEDQEBBBIRVhABCgsNAgImAgIiEgEFARwGEwgaiAsEqxc+MYsukgaFDwqBF4lrh1yBQgEEmG+RQxIjgRWCJByBUG+BRH8BAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0CbAQC1NOJUlDDXVdFbhDIEgn/GPwdDAQEBAQEBEAEBAQEHCwsJEjCEDQEBBBIRVhABCgsNAgImAgIiEgEFARwGEwgaiAsEqxc+MYsukgaFDwqBF4lrh1yBQgEEmG+RQxIjgRWCJByBUG+BRH8BAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,589,1418079600"; d="scan'208";a="122001203" Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 16 Feb 2015 19:22:47 +0100 Received: by labgd6 with SMTP id gd6so31404774lab.7 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:22:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hcMZJhARuc2M3Z5tfWc0hFTxcnmvnxrAaJrOAt5PidA=; b=lUSYtScrwhCNqabR81/VHVpGXTtQaVBkAcScyDI7rxgPwoWYr1q+3w+zHF9y3bTslk X7eNDgl8wrkHwQ/xMKgYu0qQrnGDJe5KHJYybcHlOrx4vYMKo2i0IOSGQ1QPAvDeZW6E /YElZQuN9nOGuSRef5mtoIsVgm4a3ixVAGaGUNrs5xN77N4i/eWLsNJFWFQon1hNG/ac G4pfHm6oLE2kWVMdW2KkZEeCAnpq7XTkktVjc62eHMlWCiJT/lcjpqOzQXTK8KzfZVL/ qK+SYPqP9m2NdSCEaHx5R8Sr80VIATo3rtoyG7EFHC4RkbTJO91aha2AWxExiHb/HEdk Bxdw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnjAcG87ODyJhr1iCIWi1zFKSCszmZfi/Df63qD2LnzMPjq1HwTiIp7KY+UsN+ebray66P3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.92.204 with SMTP id co12mr24478021lbb.43.1424110966318; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:22:46 -0800 (PST) Sender: stedolan@stedolan.net Received: by 10.112.130.135 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:22:46 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [94.118.128.8] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:22:46 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gvFavKuvGbBu4-vT8k9uBlqxhbE Message-ID: From: Stephen Dolan To: Anil Madhavapeddy Cc: Ocaml Mailing List , opam-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OPAM: retiring 3.12.1 testing? On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > Dear OCaml list, > > We are currently testing the following compiler versions on every pull request to OPAM; > > - OCaml 3.12.1 > - OCaml 4.00.1 > - OCaml 4.01.0 > - OCaml 4.02.0 > > We will shortly have to test 4.02.1, and would also like to test trunk snapshots of the > compiler as an "allowed failure". > > Running 6 compiler revisions per package puts quite a bit of stress on our Travis CI > resources, and so it's probably time to retire OCaml 3.12.1 from the testing matrix. Getting rid of 4.02.0 will probably ease more CI-stress than getting rid of 3.12.1: as Gabriel points out, one of the few changes from 4.02.0 to 4.02.1 is to fix the atrocious compile times of 4.02.0. Stephen