Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Dolan <stephen.dolan@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org>
Cc: Ocaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>,
	opam-devel <opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OPAM: retiring 3.12.1 testing?
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:22:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+mHimMPOVnfXSGqVDDJSKBXg6trRXdXraN_TmrNydBvvRKTXw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DA83A128-9AA1-4AB4-84FE-9762A9AB0C7C@recoil.org>

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org> wrote:
> Dear OCaml list,
>
> We are currently testing the following compiler versions on every pull request to OPAM;
>
> - OCaml 3.12.1
> - OCaml 4.00.1
> - OCaml 4.01.0
> - OCaml 4.02.0
>
> We will shortly have to test 4.02.1, and would also like to test trunk snapshots of the
> compiler as an "allowed failure".
>
> Running 6 compiler revisions per package puts quite a bit of stress on our Travis CI
> resources, and so it's probably time to retire OCaml 3.12.1 from the testing matrix.

Getting rid of 4.02.0 will probably ease more CI-stress than getting
rid of 3.12.1: as Gabriel points out, one of the few changes from
4.02.0 to 4.02.1 is to fix the atrocious compile times of 4.02.0.

Stephen

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-16 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-16 11:04 Anil Madhavapeddy
2015-02-16 11:21 ` Török Edwin
2015-02-16 11:25   ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2015-02-16 15:59 ` François Bobot
2015-02-16 16:09   ` Gabriel Scherer
2015-02-16 18:22 ` Stephen Dolan [this message]
2015-02-16 18:52 ` Adrien Nader
2015-02-17  0:36   ` [Caml-list] [opam-devel] " Louis Gesbert
2015-02-17  7:15   ` [Caml-list] " Anil Madhavapeddy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+mHimMPOVnfXSGqVDDJSKBXg6trRXdXraN_TmrNydBvvRKTXw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=stephen.dolan@cl.cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=anil@recoil.org \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox