From: Ben Millwood <bmillwood@janestreet.com>
To: Emmanuel Surleau <emmanuel.surleau@gmail.com>
Cc: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>,
"David Allsopp" <dra-news@metastack.com>,
"Adrien Nader" <adrien@notk.org>,
"Malcolm Matalka" <mmatalka@gmail.com>,
"caml-list@inria.fr" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Suggested way to determine platform specific capabilities in build system?
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:55:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+MHO53=YkwrPqhJVd_vh9oi3LrsCsZRr+F7jGWr94j3qk9rSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADd2AG7NO=BNmxBbyXsr9VW85LUM+sDto__JdM=VTkgfsfWd3A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2164 bytes --]
I agree with David that use of the term "retarded" is offensive and
inappropriate in this or pretty much any context. "Mental retardation" was
until quite recently (and in some places still is) an official sanctioned
medical definition and using it to mean "clearly wrong", "unpleasant" or
"not worth dealing with" is to tell people who had been diagnosed with that
condition that they are clearly wrong, unpleasant, or not worth dealing
with. Regardless of your opinion about autoconf, that's clearly not
something that any of us want.
On 19 April 2015 at 20:14, Emmanuel Surleau <emmanuel.surleau@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Daniel Bünzli
> <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch> wrote:
> > Le dimanche, 19 avril 2015 à 12:13, David Allsopp a écrit :
> >> > I know this is the way autocrap likes to work; it may seem smart but I
> >> > think that's completely retarded.
> >>
> >> Um, while your arguments often veer a little towards ad hominem
> attacks, the word "retarded" used in this context is extremely offensive,
> even if that is not what you intended (making allowance that while your
> English is extremely good, it is not your first language).
> >
> > I don't see any ad hominem attack here I'm criticizing tools and
> approaches — if Adrien think there is one, I'm sorry and tell him he should
> not take it as such.
> >
> > Regarding the sentence you mention I'll rephrase it just for you (or any
> other person I may have offended):
> >
> > ❀ I know this is the way autoheaven likes to work, however it seems that
> while I can appreciate that this technique has his merits I do have slight
> concerns with it. ❀
>
>
> While I agree with David about the form, I agree with you about the
> content. Using version numbers brings its own pains, but all in all it
> is considerably more reliable than the other solutions.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Emm
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2960 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-20 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-14 10:51 Malcolm Matalka
2015-04-14 11:23 ` Daniel Bünzli
2015-04-14 13:17 ` Thomas Gazagnaire
2015-04-19 6:47 ` Adrien Nader
2015-04-19 8:38 ` Daniel Bünzli
2015-04-19 10:13 ` David Allsopp
2015-04-19 12:11 ` Daniel Bünzli
2015-04-19 19:14 ` Emmanuel Surleau
2015-04-20 9:55 ` Ben Millwood [this message]
2015-04-17 10:38 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2015-04-21 21:36 ` Richard W.M. Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+MHO53=YkwrPqhJVd_vh9oi3LrsCsZRr+F7jGWr94j3qk9rSg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=bmillwood@janestreet.com \
--cc=adrien@notk.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
--cc=dra-news@metastack.com \
--cc=emmanuel.surleau@gmail.com \
--cc=mmatalka@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox