From: Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr>
To: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Différence entre le vect de caml light et le array de OCaml
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:20:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C6281D26-663F-11D9-B72B-000D9345235C@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41E6B537.1080705@free.fr>
Bonjour,
On Jan 13, 2005, at 18:51, Pierre-Etienne Meunier wrote:
> Pourquoi les vecteurs de caml light ont-ils été remplacés par des
> tableaux
> dans OCaml ? Quelle est la différence en mémoire ?
Il n'y a aucune difference, c'est exactement la meme chose dans
l'implementation comme dans l'interface. Seul le nom a change, pour
etre coherent avec la terminologie employee dans la communaute
ML/Haskell.
-- Damien
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-14 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-13 17:51 Pierre-Etienne Meunier
2005-01-14 15:20 ` Damien Doligez [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C6281D26-663F-11D9-B72B-000D9345235C@inria.fr \
--to=damien.doligez@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox