From: Ruslan Ledesma Garza <ruslanledesmagarza@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Camlp4 vs Camlp5
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:00:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP715BA3EEC38D4F08BAC800C8A80@phx.gbl> (raw)
Dear list,
I would like to know how do you think Camlp4 and Camlp5 compare in terms hacker-friendliness. About three weeks ago I linked in a PoC the Ocaml file parsing loop and the Ocaml pp mechanism I found in Camlp5. I learned that Pcaml is an interface file that binds together parsing and pp for Ocaml, but I wish they were separated one from the other. At some point in the future I will recode my PoC into stable code, so I wonder if you think I should stick to Camlp5, have a look to Camlp4, or go back and figure it out by myself.
Best regards,
Ruslan.
reply other threads:[~2010-07-28 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BLU0-SMTP715BA3EEC38D4F08BAC800C8A80@phx.gbl \
--to=ruslanledesmagarza@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox