From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322D3BBAF for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:42:08 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIBAFDQqUgRlBBXo2dsb2JhbACCLo9iAQEBAQEBBwUIBxGjF4FY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,232,1217800800"; d="scan'208";a="16088215" Received: from asmtpout012.mac.com ([17.148.16.87]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Aug 2008 04:41:32 +0200 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([66.92.32.215]) by asmtp012.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.03 (built Aug 7 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0K5T00CA1U4HYN80@asmtp012.mac.com> for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Nicolas Pouillard , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Message-id: From: Paul Snively To: Jon Harrop In-reply-to: <200808150115.18531.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Haskell vs OCaml Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:40:42 -0700 References: <200808142216.26328.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <1218750570-sup-7635@ausone.local> <200808150115.18531.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail d51 (Leopard) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Spam: no; 0.00; haskell:01 ocaml:01 hash:01 fwiw:01 branching:01 merging:01 ocaml:01 beginner's:01 bug:01 frog:98 beginners:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 FWIW, I still use darcs (darcs 2) exclusively. So far, no other version control system has gotten the relationships among repositories, branching, and merging quite right, although I'm keeping a keen eye on Mercurial's forthcoming "rebase" extension. On Aug 14, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Thursday 14 August 2008 22:50:19 you wrote: >> I'm talking about the informal algorithms, their independent of >> that kind >> of things... > > Yes, that may well be true. I think we would need in-depth knowledge > of Darcs > to be able to distinguish between the two. > > Do any OCaml projects use Darcs, BTW? > > -- > Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. > http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkiqMqsACgkQIVlHUIJ6Q02suQCgim9bDlna3r0WYl8Qb2DHQDuy zgEAn1VRvTKhaKIphvp++BJJb3cyASph =Mq8B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----