From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p3O0Xq2b022103
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 02:33:52 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuUBAFJvs03RVaG2kWdsb2JhbAClYAgUAQEBAQkLCwcUBCGmX4p4gieDcDSIXgEBAwaFcASFcIhFihI6
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,260,1301868000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="106559653"
Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com ([209.85.161.182])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 24 Apr 2011 02:33:46 +0200
Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so619338gxk.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=TGW/qDUxZK4fRp8mki1/ctgt/hBqkuGzGxHa1RB6s4Y=;
        b=c0MCyXy5jyBZQtWoXWnymjj4Fbif2O8L2AsPzFoN68ZuSKKZ45zMNRvkG3MpLbbSul
         6u9LULEDg4/S4zoSn5UJqUD7N86LsgofVME1HqvVYWgtTg6kNUHW+NTr/zXo+UQ5gsXv
         XunwUyiIXFTDF2zxdN41mMUbqOIF5wWhbLx6Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=g3uYEG8rrHQLhpQ8w95d86bx0LkucXUGjXEGujPaSflegCHhUB54WKj/MV3xYRUQD8
         +YOH/AAJrqocAkAktOEW4gq2L2uoeKfBxOdfbUth03boQqHPGjzBfBRJ2topdSlsqM0/
         G3Ro9GJV8pJnPhzrdG4zcDULWWlG6KvEePoyk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.183.194 with SMTP id q42mr2693281yhm.43.1303605225826;
 Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.147.171.13 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7D1E1BE5-D04F-42FE-B36E-344E48792F8A@gmail.com>
References: <76544177.594058.1303341821437.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr>
	<4DAFE141.7080003@inria.fr>
	<4DAFF442.8000806@lexifi.com>
	<799994864.610698.1303412613509.JavaMail.root@zmbs4.inria.fr>
	<4DB136FB.6050302@inria.fr>
	<1303463512.8429.1344.camel@thinkpad>
	<BANLkTi=1hkuu9XtMyH+c5RxpM4tvK_ro3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<97D08229-2871-42F1-A50D-8E85C6C2BE31@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikHp1yu5fEuLf-=d_cMsshAcpFP5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<7D1E1BE5-D04F-42FE-B36E-344E48792F8A@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 03:33:45 +0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTin=+f-1YwARrrD31nsdzLgkgZumCg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eray Ozkural <examachine@gmail.com>
To: Alexy Khrabrov <deliverable@gmail.com>
Cc: Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf305b123469aaac04a19f3e78
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Efficient OCaml multicore -- roadmap?


--20cf305b123469aaac04a19f3e78
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Don't get me wrong, I think Clojure is a decent language. I have no qualms
with it :) I just don't think I would use it for HPC. Even O'Caml is too
slow for writing distributed memory parallel code. I can't imagine those
other things....

In the end, you guys are going to make me write yet another functional
language :D

--20cf305b123469aaac04a19f3e78
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Don&#39;t get me wrong, I think Clojure is a decent language. I have no qua=
lms with it :) I just don&#39;t think I would use it for HPC. Even O&#39;Ca=
ml is too slow for writing distributed memory parallel code. I can&#39;t im=
agine those other things....<div>
<br></div><div>In the end, you guys are going to make me write yet another =
functional language :D<br><br>
</div>

--20cf305b123469aaac04a19f3e78--