From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p3IAwJ5Y008127 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:58:19 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAJcYrE3RVdy2mGdsb2JhbACETqEFCBQBAQEBAQgJDQcUJah5ijE8giOEIjCIXQEBAwaEcXoEjgKJYDo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,231,1301868000"; d="scan'208";a="81277193" Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com ([209.85.220.182]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 18 Apr 2011 12:58:13 +0200 Received: by vxc34 with SMTP id 34so6727446vxc.27 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 03:58:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=jb2IMQQvHa97dSqzmRVHBkhCP/ZMKOvd07h2Q4NZh80=; b=H9D4Z6+8j3qR+QHnK+vS77XPLqmQXWJ8r02F5KoYrVG8xMM4hILSQVPaiW+KcavPNd QKP8JxvxUNcQ0bcg4CNAPaTnqplKMX30D6vHflx42Ys3u+O+mHfuvJS8ZzoyT2lD0l7Z U0XdZDFybJG2vd9gXXw1mLcDUd4O/1liAFJqw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=PQ4X5b3MuapCHEmCSVENxg7tJEylN81vrzA1OtLcuduMPcfr+/ybbufDtNCVpj/1k1 WcQ0oqQA6BCdiBRMHNZYRVuhXkI3qlFNPNnPMPElXcOtRQR1rjYBpYlOw2Bfj2ssKeBo O3pMNd19d0ZEIYl65ITkWOkchVhyy5VBpLgcY= Received: by 10.220.203.75 with SMTP id fh11mr1343116vcb.202.1303124292200; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 03:58:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.176.135 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 03:57:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <015f01cbfd37$737f9200$5a7eb600$@ffconsultancy.com> References: <4DAB16B0.70403@inria.fr> <015f01cbfd37$737f9200$5a7eb600$@ffconsultancy.com> From: Paolo Donadeo Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:57:52 +0200 Message-ID: To: OCaml mailing list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba181c2688e87304a12f44b1 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] posting policy --90e6ba181c2688e87304a12f44b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 21:41, Jon Harrop wrote: > > I've also noticed that Google Groups is no longer archiving fa.caml... :-( > This behavior depends on the header "X-no-archive: yes" that the mailing list software adds to each message. Xavier, could you ask the administrator to remove that header? I consider Google Groups very useful and I think I'm not alone and, furthermore, I don't see evil side effects in having another (free) mirror of the mailing list. --=20 *Paolo =E2=A0=A0=E2=A0=B5* --90e6ba181c2688e87304a12f44b1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 21:41, Jon Harrop <jonath= andeanharrop@googlemail.com> wrote:
I've also noticed that Google Groups is no longer archiving fa.caml... = :-(

This=C2=A0behavior=C2=A0depends on the h= eader "X-no-archive: yes" that the mailing list software adds to = each message.

Xavier, could you ask the administrato= r to remove that header? I consider Google Groups very useful and I think I= 'm not alone and,=C2=A0furthermore, I don't see evil side effects i= n having another (free) mirror of the mailing list.


--
Paolo =E2=A0=A0=E2=A0=B5
--90e6ba181c2688e87304a12f44b1--