From: Yaron Minsky <yminsky@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] REMINDER: CUFP 2011 deadline June 15th
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 20:25:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=pywGabxb7zMYiLkVmFpVdJB2caQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
CUFP is a workshop for commercial users of functional programming, and
the dealine for proposals is fast approaching. If you use OCaml (or
any other functional language) for practical applications, then you
should consider applying! CUFP is a lot of fun, and this year it will
be happening in Asia for the first time, in Tokyo. As usual, CUFP is
co-located with ICFP. You can find the call for presentations here:
http://cufp.org/2011-call-presentations
and I've also included a text version below:
===============================================
CUFP Workshop
Sponsored by SIGPLAN, Co-located with ICFP 2011
Tokyo, Japan
Sep 22-24
Proposal Submission Deadline 15 June 2011
===============================================
Functional programming languages have been a hot topic of academic
research for over 35 years, and they have seen an ever larger
practical impact in settings ranging from tech startups to financial
firms to biomedical research labs. At the same time, a vigorous
community of programmers employing functional languages has come into
existence. CUFP is designed to serve this community. The annual CUFP
workshop is a place where people can see how others are using
functional programming to solve real world problems; where
practitioners meet and collaborate; where language designers and users
can share ideas about the future of their favorite language; and where
one can learn practical techniques and approaches for putting
functional programming to work.
Giving a CUFP Talk
==================
If you have experience using functional languages in a practical
setting, we invite you to submit a proposal to give a talk at the
workshop. We're looking for two kinds of talks:
**Experience reports** are typically 25 minutes long, and aim to inform
participants about how functional programming plays out in real-world
applications, focusing especially on lessons learned and insights
gained. Experience reports don't need to be highly technical;
reflections on the commercial, management, or software engineering
aspects are, if anything, more important.
**Technical talks** are also 25 minutes long, and should focus on teaching
the audience something about a particular technique or methodology,
from the point of view of someone who has seen it play
out in practice. These talks could cover anything from techniques for
building functional concurrent applications, to managing dynamic
reconfigurations, to design recipes for using types effectively in
large-scale applications. While these talks will often be based on a
particular language, they should be accessible to a broad range of
programmers.
If you are interested in offering a talk, or nominating someone to do
so, send an e-mail to avsm2(at)cl(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk or
yminsky(at)janestreet(dot)com by **15 June 2011** with a short description
of what you'd like to talk about or what you think your nominee should
give a talk about. Such descriptions should be about one page long.
There will be a short scribes report of the presentations and discussions
but not of the details of individual talks, as the meeting is intended to
be more a discussion forum than a technical interchange. *You do
not need to submit a paper*, just a proposal for your talk!
Program Committee
-----------------
* Anil Madhavapeddy (University of Cambridge)
* Yaron Minsky (Jane Street)
* Jun Furuse (Standard Chartered)
* Marius Eriksen (Twitter Inc.)
* Michael Williams (Ericsson)
* Mike McClurg (Citrix Systems R&D)
* R. Kent Dybvig (Indiana University)
* Richard Minerich (Bayard Rock)
* Sally Browning (Galois)
* Shankar Natarajan (SRI Inc.)
More information
----------------
For more information on CUFP, including videos of presentations from
previous years, take a look at the CUFP website at <http://cufp.org>.
Note that presenters, like other attendees, will need to register for
the event. Presentations will be video taped and presenters will be
expected to sign an ACM copyright release form. Acceptance and
rejection letters will be sent out by July 15th.
Guidance on giving a great CUFP talk
-------------------------------
* **Focus on the interesting bits**: Think about what will distinguish
your talk, and what will engage the audience, and focus there.
There are a number of places to look for those interesting bits.
* **Setting**: There are a few areas where FP is pretty well
established, including formal verification, financial processing and
server-side web-services. An unusual setting can be a source of
interest. If you're deploying FP-based mobile UIs or building
servers on oil rigs, then the challenges of that scenario are worth
focusing on. Did FP help or hinder in adapting to the setting?
* **Social**: as with any new technology, there are often barriers to
gaining acceptance within an organisation (be it a startup or a big
corporation). Did you face any objections with your choice of
language (e.g. hiring worries, risk of new technology, training
difficulty). How did this pan out and are there lessons in there for
others?
* **Technology**: The CUFP audience is hungry to learn about how FP
techniques work in practice. What design patterns have you applied,
and to what areas? Did you use functional reactive programming for
user interfaces, or DSLs for playing chess, or fault-tolerant actors
for large scale geological data processing? Teach us something
about the techniques you used, and why we should consider using them
ourselves.
* **Getting things done**: How did you deal with large software
development in the absence of a myriad of pre-existing support that
are often expected in larger commercial environments (IDEs, coverage
tools, debuggers, profilers) and without larger, proven bodies of
libraries? Did you hit any brick walls that required support from
the community?
* **Don't just be a cheerleader**: It's easy to write a rah-rah talk
about how well FP worked for you, but CUFP is more interesting when
the talks also spend time on what _doesn't_ work. Even when the
results were all great, you should spend more time on the challenges
along the way than on the parts that went smoothly.
* **Don't go too fast**: CUFP talks are short --- you have 25 minutes
to get your point across. So don't rush through a lot of technical
material at high speed.
* **Keep your slides light**: Don't put too much on your slides. You
especially shouldn't be reading sentences from your slides
aloud. Slides are best when used for keeping track of the broad
structure of your talk, and presenting code snippets or graphics.
Also, keep your font sizes nice and big so people can read from the
back of the room!
* **Give a talk that you would love**: As a practitioner of functional
programming, ask yourself what topics *you* would like to hear more
about, and guide your talk towards those areas.
reply other threads:[~2011-06-07 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=pywGabxb7zMYiLkVmFpVdJB2caQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=yminsky@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox