From: Philippe Wang <philippe.wang@lip6.fr>
To: Joel Reymont <joelr1@gmail.com>
Cc: Philippe Wang <philippe.wang@lip6.fr>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] "ok with parallel threads" GC (aka ocaml for multicore)
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:29:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AB724E53-D83E-4852-938A-F988E744D1C2@lip6.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F3D8F79A-4748-4838-A62F-5F5424F09A13@gmail.com>
On Apr 18, 2009, at 00:20 CEDT, Joel Reymont wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:15 PM, Philippe Wang wrote:
>
>> PS. We tried to switch to 3.11, but it seems to need too much
>> time, it's far from being a piece of cake.
>> We have tried to make it work on Leopard (actually, I failed the
>> 1st time - half the way, I may try again if I have time).
>
>
> What was the problem with Leopard?
We have our own amd64.S which is based on but quite different from
ocaml 3.10 amd64.S.
ocaml 3.11 has its amd64.S changed for Leopard.
*And* we have made some small changes to emit.ml.
Then, building the whole thing is not trivial.
Building ocaml 3.10 with our modified runtime is not trivial with
Linux x86_64 : we use an intern script that does it. Without it, it
would need hours to build it.
Adapting the script for Leopard is not trivial to do. But we think
it's quite possible.
Besides, it was late at night and I was sleepy and tired when I tried.
Another answer is Leopard needs the changes made to amd64.S from 3.10
to 3.11, which mainly fix an alignment problem.
--
Philippe Wang
Philippe.Wang@lip6.fr
http://www-apr.lip6.fr/~pwang/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-17 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-10 17:04 Philippe Wang
2009-04-10 20:52 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2009-04-10 23:20 ` Jerome Benoit
[not found] ` <BB3C091F-3BE9-4883-A7CF-9D672CDDF829@x9c.fr>
2009-04-14 10:21 ` Philippe Wang
2009-04-14 14:18 ` xclerc
2009-04-16 9:45 ` Philippe Wang
2009-04-17 22:15 ` Philippe Wang
2009-04-17 22:20 ` Joel Reymont
2009-04-17 22:29 ` Philippe Wang [this message]
2009-04-17 23:05 ` forum
2009-04-23 16:49 ` Philippe Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AB724E53-D83E-4852-938A-F988E744D1C2@lip6.fr \
--to=philippe.wang@lip6.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=joelr1@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox