From: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Francois.Pottier@inria.fr
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Array.make exception and parser
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 20:30:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin_=PdNJ_iOqE+g9otb0JEv74iW=Co1Qx2JjXmz@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110104174545.GA1535@yquem.inria.fr>
> For what it's worth, here is my answer: an LR parser generator (like Menhir)
> accepts a larger class of grammars without refactoring (no need to eliminate
> left recursion, identify common left factors, etc.) and is also able to
> *explain* why the grammar is ambiguous (or rather, why it lies outside the LR
> class), which a combinator-based approach cannot do.
So everybody trades developer convenience for end user convenience --
I mean, the syntax errors produced by LR parsers are just terrible,
the ocaml compiler is here to witness that.
That's depressing.
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-04 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-04 13:41 Jean Krivine
2011-01-04 14:56 ` Daniel Bünzli
2011-01-04 14:57 ` Daniel Bünzli
2011-01-04 14:57 ` Török Edwin
2011-01-04 15:14 ` Jean Krivine
2011-01-04 15:31 ` Daniel Bünzli
2011-01-04 16:22 ` Yitzhak Mandelbaum
2011-01-04 16:42 ` Daniel Bünzli
2011-01-04 17:03 ` Yitzhak Mandelbaum
2011-01-04 17:04 ` Jean Krivine
2011-01-04 17:22 ` Daniel Bünzli
2011-01-04 15:38 ` bluestorm
2011-01-04 17:43 ` Jean Krivine
[not found] ` <1125074892.441923.1294163043602.JavaMail.root@zmbs2.inria.fr>
2011-01-04 17:53 ` Francois Pottier
[not found] ` <1259991756.440008.1294155536392.JavaMail.root@zmbs2.inria.fr>
2011-01-04 17:45 ` Francois Pottier
2011-01-04 19:30 ` Daniel Bünzli [this message]
2011-01-04 19:52 ` Yitzhak Mandelbaum
2011-01-04 20:36 ` Daniel Bünzli
[not found] ` <1263353434.442766.1294169448342.JavaMail.root@zmbs2.inria.fr>
2011-01-04 20:31 ` Francois Pottier
2011-01-04 20:40 ` Lukasz Stafiniak
2011-01-04 21:03 ` Török Edwin
2011-01-05 3:24 ` Yitzhak Mandelbaum
2011-01-05 14:12 ` Boris Yakobowski
2011-01-05 21:12 ` Boris Yakobowski
2011-01-05 13:37 ` Xavier Leroy
2011-01-05 13:46 ` Jean Krivine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTin_=PdNJ_iOqE+g9otb0JEv74iW=Co1Qx2JjXmz@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
--cc=Francois.Pottier@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox