From: Eray Ozkural <examachine@gmail.com>
To: Florent Ouchet <florent.ouchet@imag.fr>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Static exception analysis or alternative to using exceptions
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:50:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinV_zrD4SXGnhVSb5C1VZqGhy_1VxGpffvGMnKY@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BFE2881.1070705@imag.fr>
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Florent Ouchet <florent.ouchet@imag.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Same here, specially to avoid the Not_found exception.
> The optional return values gives the oportunity to have a clear view of what
> is being done if the result is not available.
That depends on the code, I think. In some cases the exception may
arise from deep in the code, and it would make sense not to bother
with a lot of type overhead for many levels of nesting and function
calling. But if all you are doing is checking the success of a
function, I suppose option types will be more efficient.
Best,
--
Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-26 17:30 Dario Teixeira
2010-05-26 21:10 ` Hans Ole Rafaelsen
2010-05-27 3:37 ` Jacques Le Normand
2010-05-27 8:08 ` Florent Ouchet
2010-05-27 8:50 ` Eray Ozkural [this message]
2010-05-27 11:10 ` Florent Ouchet
2010-05-27 8:54 ` David Allsopp
2010-05-27 9:11 ` Mark Shinwell
2010-05-27 9:29 ` David Allsopp
2010-05-27 9:12 ` Daniel Bünzli
2010-05-27 9:19 ` David Allsopp
2010-05-27 9:15 ` David Rajchenbach-Teller
2010-05-27 13:56 ` Hezekiah M. Carty
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-01 19:08 Peter Ronnquist
2010-05-26 16:15 Hans Ole Rafaelsen
2010-05-27 9:34 ` [Caml-list] " Alain Frisch
2010-05-27 17:01 ` Richard Jones
2010-05-27 21:13 ` Dario Teixeira
2010-05-31 14:36 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-05-31 15:00 ` Florent Ouchet
2010-05-31 17:24 ` David Allsopp
2010-05-31 20:51 ` Török Edwin
2010-06-08 9:16 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-05-31 19:30 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2010-05-31 20:57 ` Lukasz Stafiniak
2010-05-31 21:42 ` blue storm
2010-05-31 19:36 ` Christophe Raffalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTinV_zrD4SXGnhVSb5C1VZqGhy_1VxGpffvGMnKY@mail.gmail.com \
--to=examachine@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=florent.ouchet@imag.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox