* [Caml-list] Converting "fun ... (type t) ..." into a caml < 3.12 code
@ 2011-01-26 12:58 Julien Signoles
2011-01-26 15:17 ` Stefan Holdermans
2011-01-26 16:55 ` Jeremy Yallop
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Julien Signoles @ 2011-01-26 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Caml List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 508 bytes --]
Hello,
How to convert the following ocaml 3.12 code into a typable ocaml < 3.12
code?
I have a solution using Obj. Is it possible without Obj?
=====
(* val f: 'a -> 'a list *)
let f (type u) (x:u) =
let module S =
Set.Make(struct
type t = u
let compare = Pervasives.compare
let equal = ( = )
end)
in
S.elements (S.singleton x)
=====
The contraints are:
* do not change the type of f
* use the functor Set.Make where type of keys are the same that type of x
Thanks,
Julien
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 600 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Converting "fun ... (type t) ..." into a caml < 3.12 code
2011-01-26 12:58 [Caml-list] Converting "fun ... (type t) ..." into a caml < 3.12 code Julien Signoles
@ 2011-01-26 15:17 ` Stefan Holdermans
[not found] ` <AANLkTinyQn4L0C8hHHXJP20upzi++2oKU6RC-2ZTEjDA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-01-26 16:55 ` Jeremy Yallop
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Holdermans @ 2011-01-26 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julien Signoles; +Cc: Caml List
Julien,
> How to convert the following ocaml 3.12 code into a typable ocaml < 3.12 code?
Coincidentally, earlier today, I ran into a situation not that different from the one you describe. I haven't come up with a satisfying solution yet.
> I have a solution using Obj. Is it possible without Obj?
Are you willing to share this solution?
> =====
> (* val f: 'a -> 'a list *)
> let f (type u) (x:u) =
> let module S =
> Set.Make(struct
> type t = u
> let compare = Pervasives.compare
> let equal = ( = )
> end)
> in
> S.elements (S.singleton x)
> =====
>
> The contraints are:
> * do not change the type of f
> * use the functor Set.Make where type of keys are the same that type of x
Cheers,
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Converting "fun ... (type t) ..." into a caml < 3.12 code
2011-01-26 12:58 [Caml-list] Converting "fun ... (type t) ..." into a caml < 3.12 code Julien Signoles
2011-01-26 15:17 ` Stefan Holdermans
@ 2011-01-26 16:55 ` Jeremy Yallop
2011-01-27 14:18 ` Julien Signoles
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Yallop @ 2011-01-26 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julien Signoles; +Cc: Caml List
On 26 January 2011 12:58, Julien Signoles <julien.signoles@gmail.com> wrote:
> How to convert the following ocaml 3.12 code into a typable ocaml < 3.12
> code?
> I have a solution using Obj. Is it possible without Obj?
There are safer approaches (than Obj) to a "universal type" described here:
http://ocaml.janestreet.com/?q=node/18
Whether your problem can be solved with such an approach depends on
how flexible your definition of "the same [type]" is. You can
certainly write a function of the same type and behaviour as 'f' that
way, though.
Jeremy.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Converting "fun ... (type t) ..." into a caml < 3.12 code
2011-01-26 16:55 ` Jeremy Yallop
@ 2011-01-27 14:18 ` Julien Signoles
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Julien Signoles @ 2011-01-27 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Yallop; +Cc: Caml List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1427 bytes --]
Hello,
2011/1/26 Jeremy Yallop <yallop@gmail.com>
> On 26 January 2011 12:58, Julien Signoles <julien.signoles@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > How to convert the following ocaml 3.12 code into a typable ocaml < 3.12
> > code?
> > I have a solution using Obj. Is it possible without Obj?
>
> There are safer approaches (than Obj) to a "universal type" described here:
>
> http://ocaml.janestreet.com/?q=node/18
>
> Whether your problem can be solved with such an approach depends on
> how flexible your definition of "the same [type]" is. You can
> certainly write a function of the same type and behaviour as 'f' that
> way, though.
>
I'm aware of such an universal type. It works fine for the small example of
my original post. However I see no way to use it on my real case because it
is a bit more complex. Actually it looks like:
=====
(* val f: 'a u -> 'a list u *)
type 'a u = ... (* a phantom type, defined in another file *)
let f (type v) (x:v u) =
let module S =
F(struct
type t = v u (* waiting a type t of the form w u for some w *)
let x = x
(* an additional list of operations over t *)
let equal = ( = ) (* ... *)
end)
in
(S.y : v list u) (* S.y is opaque: no way to destruct it *)
=====
I see no way to inject and project values [x] and/or [S.y] to any universal
type since the conversion from [x] to [S.y] is done internally by the
functor F.
Thanks for your help,
Julien
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2002 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-27 14:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-26 12:58 [Caml-list] Converting "fun ... (type t) ..." into a caml < 3.12 code Julien Signoles
2011-01-26 15:17 ` Stefan Holdermans
[not found] ` <AANLkTinyQn4L0C8hHHXJP20upzi++2oKU6RC-2ZTEjDA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-01-26 16:30 ` Julien Signoles
2011-01-26 16:55 ` Jeremy Yallop
2011-01-27 14:18 ` Julien Signoles
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox