Why would you use ocsigen to serve static files?
For corefarm.com we put all the files in amazon s3 and we just generate on the fly the url to retrieve them (adding the timestamp, signing the get parameters etc).
My 2 cents,
william
On 26-07-2010, Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@yahoo.com> wrote:You guess right ;-)
> Hi,
>
>> I am creating an application with ocsigen that requires to serve a lot
>> of .tar.gz as static contents.
>>
>> Do you think the "no Unix supports non-blocking mode" will cause problem
>> in this case?
>
> I presume that application is related to the Oasis-DB initiative, right?
There is indeed a good chance that the files end up in memory.
> I wouldn't worry too much in that case. First, because the Ocaml community
> is not that big (yet) as to cause such heavy traffic. Second, because
> the set of tar.gz files is not that great (a few hundred, max?) and those
> files will tend to be small. If your server has enough memory, there's a
> good chance many of the file blocks requested will eventually be buffered
> in memory by the kernel, thus minimising expensive disc I/O.
>
Thank you for your remarks.
Regards,
Sylvain Le Gall
_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs