From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <p.donadeo@gmail.com>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74AC4BC58
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:59:29 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnABABq9kkzRVdi0kGdsb2JhbACDG55wCBUBAQEBCQkMBxEDH6YsiH08ghSGXS2IVAEBAwWBHYMrdASKLw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,381,1280700000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="59422163"
Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2010 09:59:28 +0200
Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so2969665qyk.18
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to
         :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Pr77RFKS4I6Sb+P6cjmH2YsK9GiiIP/n91OBxbalXzU=;
        b=Hga5QVuW0EQrazNo2BNrVuPqqd3MC7zVueRSg0WCQQXjyglUju0PPyLuFJtXqaE/jD
         byzKZIrw8ACnOeQwH5adcV7qLZ5qmIG5s5QhlK43GB97wPkpz1kcooKqRPGwNEKJqS9Q
         U10iy9KTQCiRuy7dhgGPVxAJiF5xSKhvMexks=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=EJ1jRutZuNMZ8BcDzDWL4exyZM4RnfI/6TeHF8VGu0mK0UOvuF1FMzbEs0HlQp5CcW
         jlKy2VZ+k2KDsgOtMudhKCNUhMdfTASTGmgCqvFqtw/W43n4RnMNmuxkcsrym0yhBChg
         Lw1SuQz/x7R+ew70U9W2NFgAuuDe0UK8S01yE=
Received: by 10.220.127.81 with SMTP id f17mr2015724vcs.187.1284710368264;
 Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.95.210 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <21686.68875.qm@web111507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <AANLkTinT0wiW93L4=Qo16jqsbXtQmkRC_fQaQ_EDYmAL@mail.gmail.com> <21686.68875.qm@web111507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
From: Paolo Donadeo <p.donadeo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:59:08 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTin2X4fxZa+GRtk64TAGVd-3qPagU408EyaUQ6Ps@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] web server interface for Ocaml ( like rack, wsgi, ...)?
To: OCaml mailing list <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocamlnet:01 connectors:98 W6:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 constraints:03 fri:05 problem:05 install:05 sep:06 interface:06 reasoning:07 standard:07 standard:07 

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 00:04, Dario Teixeira wrote:

> Could you expand on the reasoning a little? =C2=A0I mean, what is for you
> the advantage of running Eliom over Ocamlnet as opposed to over the
> Ocsigen server?

>>From my point of view the problem with Ocsigen is that it requires you
to install an HTTP server. In the real world the programmer, or even
the project leader, don't have this freedom of choice, because there
are system constraints imposed by others. You are often asked to
provide an application, along with detailed instruction for the
installation in a standard environment, where one (ore more) HTTP
servers have some standard connectors (WSGI, FastCGI, AJP, etc...)

I'm not complaining about the Ocsigen team, of course: they are
focused on other aspects than the deploy, and this is why Eliom is so
interesting and, on the other side, I should help them, but in this
moment I have no time for another project.


--=20
Paolo =E2=A0=A0=E2=A0=B5