From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727A0BC57 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 15:16:42 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoYCAKuwAExIDtyZk2dsb2JhbACeMQgVAQEBAQkJCgkRAx+vc4UAiH0BAQMFhREEjXM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,322,1272837600"; d="scan'208";a="63623963" Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 29 May 2010 15:16:42 +0200 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so611859fgb.3 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 06:16:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8pliP7YjeYUoG2xwcOWoGMMOTfUGuXzuZQ/malzBoNs=; b=SEA1ko1M2tLis1h4R3l7GEFw/Uz68ZTw2K28bb9cmUao7ikXuaY3qoztOfWIr92YCD Bi9GoHHfjKaR9HPL6b1ha8ftQNUCeV8cm8eqsaEPi6QiWmb218z/PH8Qm270mv0ZBGpI tI4CXiwKJl1Oz4tphXAa5wuI89Qggx1H5cFIY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=sGZ2CS1UCNarfzWDos0NYlMyzobd288cLWgcwo3DurNvz+9KU1BAIEu8GvkHmvsLJx hoqi+MQeXhDFOVE6ve3uRdYy6dWx5LzdRbpyvAIHlbIZK2PQgNvbM6ZXtYwOYx56cDwm fDdWs/8MkjAxxHM3YPMBHFhmV4+51aCRA+Ook= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.254.26 with SMTP id b26mr568179mui.118.1275139001411; Sat, 29 May 2010 06:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: david.baelde@gmail.com Received: by 10.103.233.19 with HTTP; Sat, 29 May 2010 06:16:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BFE9756.7010401@gmail.com> References: <4BFB2148.5060603@colba.net> <20100526.163107.618177699151860158.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umons.ac.be> <4BFE9756.7010401@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 15:16:41 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: aS8Mb7jFmWM50iqJdtl33H7PycI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Caml-list] New emacs tuareg mode From: David Baelde To: Edgar Friendly Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam: no; 0.00; emacs:01 tuareg:01 ens-lyon:01 syntax:01 ocaml:01 tuareg:01 cheers:01 edgar:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 let:03 indentation:04 tricky:04 clarify:04 thu:05 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Edgar Friendly wrot= e: > Your first code block is a good example of non indented [let] blocks look= ing > good. =A0Your second example should be indented as follows to clarify its > actual structure: > > if blah then > =A0f () ; > g () ; > h () Right, this was a bad example, and I can't think of a good one. Maybe indentation can't help with that tricky syntax after all, and all I can say is "I prefer the way it looks that way" (which is no surprise since I've been learning OCaml under Tuareg). Cheers, --=20 David