From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E275FBC57 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 15:57:29 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsICABAX/ktKfVM0kWdsb2JhbACDF5p9CBUBAQEBCQsKBxEDH695iDWIX4ElgwRqBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,311,1272837600"; d="scan'208";a="63521720" Received: from mail-gw0-f52.google.com ([74.125.83.52]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 27 May 2010 15:57:24 +0200 Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so4130256gwj.39 for ; Thu, 27 May 2010 06:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.62.13 with SMTP id k13mr191748yba.133.1274968636198; Thu, 27 May 2010 06:57:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: hcarty@mulethief.com Received: by 10.150.177.20 with HTTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 06:56:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <956439.81564.qm@web111506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> From: "Hezekiah M. Carty" Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:56:56 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qzFlOh22IFyRi_AjZo9J81pWnSE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Static exception analysis or alternative to using exceptions To: Jacques Le Normand Cc: Hans Ole Rafaelsen , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam: no; 0.00; 26,:98 wrote:01 exception:01 caml-list:01 functions:01 exceptions:01 exceptions:01 modules:02 seems:03 jacques:03 static:03 wed:06 batteries:91 wrap:08 core:09 On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Jacques Le Normand wrote: > Jane Street's Core seems to prefer options to exceptions > Batteries also includes a number of Exceptionless modules (ex. Array.Exceptionless) which wrap exception-raising functions to use options instead.