* functor substitution gives error
@ 2010-09-06 9:12 Hendrik Tews
2010-09-06 9:39 ` [Caml-list] " Daniel Bünzli
2010-09-07 10:48 ` Jacques Garrigue
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hendrik Tews @ 2010-09-06 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
Hi,
I have a strange compilation problem, which I suspect to be a
compiler bug. Consider the following nested functor application
module A(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
FreshGram(struct end)
module B(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
Printers_Ocaml_Make(A(FreshGram))
This compiles fine, however, when I manually inline functor A:
module C(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
Printers_Ocaml_Make(FreshGram(struct end))
I get a signature mismatch error in both 3.11.2 and 3.12. I would
appreciate any explanation for this behaviour.
As the names suggest the problem came up with in some Camlp4
code. Here is a striped down version, which reproduces the
problem:
==============================================================================
module type Loc = sig (* simplified version of Camlp4.Sig.Loc *)
type t
end
module type Camlp4Ast = sig (* simplified Camlp4.Sig.Camlp4Ast *)
module Loc : Loc
end
module type Camlp4Syntax = sig (* simplified Camlp4.Sig.Camlp4Syntax *)
module Loc : Loc
module Ast : Camlp4Ast with module Loc = Loc
end
module type Printers_Ocaml_Make_Sig = (* .mli of Camlp4/Printers/OCaml *)
functor(Syntax : Camlp4Syntax) ->
sig
include Camlp4Syntax
with module Loc = Syntax.Loc
and module Ast = Syntax.Ast
end
module Printers_Ocaml_Make : (* .ml of Camlp4/Printers/OCaml *)
Printers_Ocaml_Make_Sig = functor(Syntax : Camlp4Syntax) ->
struct
include Syntax
end
module A(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
FreshGram(struct end)
module B(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
Printers_Ocaml_Make(A(FreshGram))
module C(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
Printers_Ocaml_Make(FreshGram(struct end))
===============================================================================
The error occurs in the last line and says
Error: Signature mismatch:
Modules do not match:
sig
module Loc : sig type t end
module Ast : sig module Loc : sig type t end end
end
is not included in
Camlp4Syntax
Modules do not match:
sig module Loc : sig type t = Ast.Loc.t end end
is not included in
sig module Loc : sig type t = Loc.t end end
Modules do not match:
sig type t = Ast.Loc.t end
is not included in
sig type t = Loc.t end
Type declarations do not match:
type t = Ast.Loc.t
is not included in
type t = Loc.t
The error goes away with the following version of Printers_Ocaml_Make_Sig:
module type Printers_Ocaml_Make_Sig = functor(Syntax : Camlp4Syntax) ->
sig
module Loc : Loc
with type t = Syntax.Loc.t
module Ast : Camlp4Ast
with type Loc.t = Syntax.Ast.Loc.t
and type Loc.t = Loc.t
end
IMHO both Printers_Ocaml_Make_Sig versions should be equivalent:
in the second version the include is spelled out and the module
constraints are expanded into type constraints.
The error comes back if one changes the order of the type
constaints for module Ast.
Bye,
Hendrik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] functor substitution gives error
2010-09-06 9:12 functor substitution gives error Hendrik Tews
@ 2010-09-06 9:39 ` Daniel Bünzli
2010-09-07 20:46 ` Jacques Garrigue
2010-09-07 10:48 ` Jacques Garrigue
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Bünzli @ 2010-09-06 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hendrik Tews; +Cc: caml-list
I think I just hit the same kind problem.
This doesn't compile :
----
module A : sig
type m
module M : sig
type t = m
end
end = struct
module M = struct
module S = String
module Smap = Map.Make(S)
type t = int Smap.t
end
type m = M.t
end
----
Type declarations do not match:
type t = int Smap.t
is not included in
type t = m
However if I put S outside M, or if I specify the type of Smap it compiles :
----
module A : sig
type m
module M : sig
type t = m
end
end = struct
module S = String
module M = struct
module Smap = Map.Make(S)
type t = int Smap.t
end
type m = M.t
end
----
----
module A : sig
type m
module M : sig
type t = m
end
end = struct
module M = struct
module S = String
module Smap = (Map.Make(S) : Map.S with type key = S.t)
type t = int Smap.t
end
type m = M.t
end
----
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] functor substitution gives error
2010-09-06 9:12 functor substitution gives error Hendrik Tews
2010-09-06 9:39 ` [Caml-list] " Daniel Bünzli
@ 2010-09-07 10:48 ` Jacques Garrigue
2010-09-07 13:32 ` Hendrik Tews
2010-09-07 13:54 ` Daniel Bünzli
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jacques Garrigue @ 2010-09-07 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hendrik Tews; +Cc: caml-list
On 2010/09/06, at 18:12, Hendrik Tews wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange compilation problem, which I suspect to be a
> compiler bug. Consider the following nested functor application
>
>
> module A(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
> FreshGram(struct end)
>
> module B(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
> Printers_Ocaml_Make(A(FreshGram))
>
>
> This compiles fine, however, when I manually inline functor A:
>
>
> module C(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
> Printers_Ocaml_Make(FreshGram(struct end))
>
>
> I get a signature mismatch error in both 3.11.2 and 3.12. I would
> appreciate any explanation for this behaviour.
The reason is that the typing of modules is not closed under substitution.
More precisely, the use of anonymous modules (the "struct end" in your
code) is highly disruptive. It requires all modules around it to have
non-dependent signatures, whereas the ability to express dependency
is the great strength of applicative functors...
Actually, all the theory was built assuming that there no anonymous modules.
The solution is easy enough: name all modules.
Here you just have to write:
module Unit = struct end
module C(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
Printers_Ocaml_Make(FreshGram(Unit))
Hope this helps.
Jacques Garrigue
> As the names suggest the problem came up with in some Camlp4
> code. Here is a striped down version, which reproduces the
> problem:
>
> ==============================================================================
> module type Loc = sig (* simplified version of Camlp4.Sig.Loc *)
> type t
> end
>
> module type Camlp4Ast = sig (* simplified Camlp4.Sig.Camlp4Ast *)
> module Loc : Loc
> end
>
> module type Camlp4Syntax = sig (* simplified Camlp4.Sig.Camlp4Syntax *)
> module Loc : Loc
> module Ast : Camlp4Ast with module Loc = Loc
> end
>
> module type Printers_Ocaml_Make_Sig = (* .mli of Camlp4/Printers/OCaml *)
> functor(Syntax : Camlp4Syntax) ->
> sig
> include Camlp4Syntax
> with module Loc = Syntax.Loc
> and module Ast = Syntax.Ast
> end
>
> module Printers_Ocaml_Make : (* .ml of Camlp4/Printers/OCaml *)
> Printers_Ocaml_Make_Sig = functor(Syntax : Camlp4Syntax) ->
> struct
> include Syntax
> end
>
>
> module A(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
> FreshGram(struct end)
>
> module B(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
> Printers_Ocaml_Make(A(FreshGram))
>
> module C(FreshGram : functor(Unit : sig end) -> Camlp4Syntax) : Camlp4Syntax =
> Printers_Ocaml_Make(FreshGram(struct end))
> ===============================================================================
>
> The error occurs in the last line and says
>
> Error: Signature mismatch:
> Modules do not match:
> sig
> module Loc : sig type t end
> module Ast : sig module Loc : sig type t end end
> end
> is not included in
> Camlp4Syntax
> Modules do not match:
> sig module Loc : sig type t = Ast.Loc.t end end
> is not included in
> sig module Loc : sig type t = Loc.t end end
> Modules do not match:
> sig type t = Ast.Loc.t end
> is not included in
> sig type t = Loc.t end
> Type declarations do not match:
> type t = Ast.Loc.t
> is not included in
> type t = Loc.t
>
> The error goes away with the following version of Printers_Ocaml_Make_Sig:
>
> module type Printers_Ocaml_Make_Sig = functor(Syntax : Camlp4Syntax) ->
> sig
> module Loc : Loc
> with type t = Syntax.Loc.t
>
> module Ast : Camlp4Ast
> with type Loc.t = Syntax.Ast.Loc.t
> and type Loc.t = Loc.t
> end
>
> IMHO both Printers_Ocaml_Make_Sig versions should be equivalent:
> in the second version the include is spelled out and the module
> constraints are expanded into type constraints.
>
> The error comes back if one changes the order of the type
> constaints for module Ast.
>
>
> Bye,
>
> Hendrik
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] functor substitution gives error
2010-09-07 10:48 ` Jacques Garrigue
@ 2010-09-07 13:32 ` Hendrik Tews
2010-09-07 13:54 ` Daniel Bünzli
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hendrik Tews @ 2010-09-07 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> writes:
On 2010/09/06, at 18:12, Hendrik Tews wrote:
> I have a strange compilation problem, which I suspect to be a
> compiler bug. Consider the following nested functor application
The reason is that the typing of modules is not closed under substitution.
I am really surprised by this! I was sure I hit a compiler
problem, especially because changing the order of the
with-constraints solved the problem.
The solution is easy enough: name all modules.
May I suggest to put a few words about this in the ocaml
reference manual?
Thanks for the hint,
Hendrik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] functor substitution gives error
2010-09-07 10:48 ` Jacques Garrigue
2010-09-07 13:32 ` Hendrik Tews
@ 2010-09-07 13:54 ` Daniel Bünzli
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Bünzli @ 2010-09-07 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
> The solution is easy enough: name all modules.
In my example all modules are named. Can you maybe provide an
explanation of what's happening ?
Best,
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] functor substitution gives error
2010-09-06 9:39 ` [Caml-list] " Daniel Bünzli
@ 2010-09-07 20:46 ` Jacques Garrigue
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jacques Garrigue @ 2010-09-07 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Bünzli; +Cc: Hendrik Tews, caml-list
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Daniel Bünzli
<daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch> wrote:
> I think I just hit the same kind problem.
>
> This doesn't compile :
> ----
> module A : sig
> type m
> module M : sig
> type t = m
> end
> end = struct
> module M = struct
> module S = String
> module Smap = Map.Make(S)
> type t = int Smap.t
> end
> type m = M.t
> end
> ----
>
> Type declarations do not match:
> type t = int Smap.t
> is not included in
> type t = m
>
> However if I put S outside M, or if I specify the type of Smap it compiles :
At first, I thought this was a different problem, since there is no
"struct end".
However, this is actually the same problem.
To understand what is happening, you must look at what is inferred for
M.Smap.t in the different cases.
In the first and second case:
type 'a t = 'a Map.Make(S).t
If you specify the type of Smap it becomes:
type +'a t (just abstract)
or after strengthening (making types refer to their location)
type 'a t = 'a M.Smap.t
Here the problem is that S, by being only defined locally, plays the same
role as "struct end". The above type equation (in the first case) forbids
the stengthening of M.Smap.t, but later it has to be discarded because one
is not allowed to depend on a local module, meaning that we end up losing
a type equation. In the second case, this doesn't happen because S is no
longer local to M, and can be kept. And in the last one, by restricting the
type of Smap, you remove the type equation on Smap.t, allowing its
strengthening (only one type equation is allowed per type, so if there is
already one, strengthening cannot be done).
Since 3.12, there is a new compiler option, -no-app-funct, which disables
applicative functors, and as a result allows strengthening in more cases.
This solves your problem, but not Hendrik's, because his example
requires applicative functor to start with.
Jacques Garrigue
[Your 2 other versions]
> ----
> module A : sig
> type m
> module M : sig
> type t = m
> end
> end = struct
> module S = String
> module M = struct
> module Smap = Map.Make(S)
> type t = int Smap.t
> end
> type m = M.t
> end
> ----
>
> ----
> module A : sig
> type m
> module M : sig
> type t = m
> end
> end = struct
> module M = struct
> module S = String
> module Smap = (Map.Make(S) : Map.S with type key = S.t)
> type t = int Smap.t
> end
> type m = M.t
> end
> ----
>
> Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-07 20:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-06 9:12 functor substitution gives error Hendrik Tews
2010-09-06 9:39 ` [Caml-list] " Daniel Bünzli
2010-09-07 20:46 ` Jacques Garrigue
2010-09-07 10:48 ` Jacques Garrigue
2010-09-07 13:32 ` Hendrik Tews
2010-09-07 13:54 ` Daniel Bünzli
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox