From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lukstafi@gmail.com>
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E819BBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sun,  5 Dec 2010 09:17:14 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar0AAMPZ+kzRVditkGdsb2JhbACjKggVAQEBAQkJDAcRBB6keYlpghmEBS6IVgEBAwWFRASKboYF
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,301,1288566000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="69887085"
Received: from mail-qy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 05 Dec 2010 09:16:59 +0100
Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so2382076qyk.18
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:16:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to
         :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=4Z796FQgfLMvomZlefkOIquoEkiJJJqIukxaECUd9y0=;
        b=ogzIzvkoqJ4qobU6J1wlOWEN9s+3j/uL75ZOiZ3qoqj+ip5v2feIJ4xRl2IYocSIAB
         A5K3hrRENUzkSpsGrp2TN9L9Ndi+Pl36m7LzRuyj2KQvzBj+QSeeHUEVE21syS6wPbSi
         vtTMNsYHp+3s+AIGuDeEzM/HBQ80/n9uIPULY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=DHgEM2Lk1I6kxPfqluxLVwfIHhfxZ3t+qzV+d69RrTyWdHQ9byMY7nVXXF9Ebxoixc
         DyYDCdoup/odnNOcWN933DiWOi2vYueusHm55j2eJ8HCkmNbYks74jXua67doSqX+HIy
         8dresWxtwzCl8ZHhUfF3IQy7nwyGAP99xlbNg=
Received: by 10.229.217.133 with SMTP id hm5mr3013658qcb.258.1291537017865;
 Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:16:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.230.149 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 00:16:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinVSDB-XWXKvJPxDzhzxox-Vmxnw9Lw2ucLy0De@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimVTv7J_b6AY1gKKT9hdQx83a+4FBM7pqvHpAHM@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimmAMG_1+UhNh+Q8bR22XsDtoF44gDd7YEwx5v+@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTim5uyeAXwSzvsVtDyQi28kqdKfE2hDOeCnRW+4Z@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTi=brs65VkfeM0qt+fLFVd=Vc7PMm809VstVN=Q-@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTin9Bdea8CZjx3OR1NsFFawSu7G8KGD_ZiTvGr1S@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimRki9EfbN0ekQQA2RmaQ2u28pHuvy37-eLhtxq@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTi=tXmna=Rk5nyQbYWNambBYUUk1=nRS=aGC0cfV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinVSDB-XWXKvJPxDzhzxox-Vmxnw9Lw2ucLy0De@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 09:16:37 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTikAgpc6unOsE6YiK=H3hYaBPXOMZvhfSDuQEbV3@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] GADT constructor syntax
To: Jacques Le Normand <rathereasy@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list caml-list <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam: no; 0.00; lukasz:01 syntax:01 lukasz:01 restricting:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 constructor:01 constraint:01 int:01 int:01 behaves:02 constraints:03 clarify:04 dec:05 standard:07 

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>
> I don't think that it is very different. Standard-language constraints
> are outside of implications, so they apply to each branch. It already
> behaves this way in the standard language, basically restricting the
> type family to "int term". So I don't see why
>
>> | Embed of 'a : 'a term
>> =A0 constraint 'a =3D int
>
> shouldn't mean that Embed is "basically" Embed of int : int term.

[To clarify: and the whole family restricted to "int term".]