From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p0RDcbbq002734
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:38:37 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkgBAJkDQU1KfVO2kWdsb2JhbACEFKBfCBYBAQEJCwoHEQQgoSaJQ4JThHuJBwEBAwWBHoM4dASMJ4od
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,386,1291590000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="86487564"
Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com ([74.125.83.182])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 27 Jan 2011 14:38:32 +0100
Received: by pvc22 with SMTP id 22so299654pvc.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:38:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=YsChijkVkoId2ZbD2uvRfRF5oFqqYU0GWh3vBZg/VPY=;
        b=fxuL9CcEKVmT6jtR2MZqOQNKwNlNEiuSMUOsJjphEJcD6XSILwdIwdTXqNkQidyYSU
         bFiss2qfBt+8TiKIbREzH5HIzALQHEQHfzjmcoyH+ndknFFC3simtIwDzv95b3iGTyU8
         zlGx1MPtTykdZO4bfai+XAIYt6QBudRChjdAU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=XSyq7AK74cGmCF5P4SP76wYKukrymGyw/LTrHBaertGEydtQCYBj/4y3D32L1uXAmG
         Ca//oiUAkEg9DZG89MTRiCt8YdcZHF270aYoBfma1GNcJw+ZUFLWwIRK7Ic+LzIhKsxB
         AdE1Un8cqBQ53ejEDNNLz8jWft2ppfWPBSbCs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.234.21 with SMTP id g21mr1623396wfh.301.1296135510010;
 Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:38:30 -0800 (PST)
Sender: daniel.c.buenzli@gmail.com
Received: by 10.143.155.16 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:38:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin6z31LrzNd=bBdH2yFTJZtTc0mkS2i3_c-b_u0@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTin6z31LrzNd=bBdH2yFTJZtTc0mkS2i3_c-b_u0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:38:29 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: PQHLi5rxlTceyHLRxJj8OEEbULg
Message-ID: <AANLkTik8AhxxTtqdHV8TT254aOYh7mr96LAUZXkk4uWW@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Raoul Duke <raould@gmail.com>
Cc: OCaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] emacs mode?

> what is the best emacs mode for ocaml?

I don't know which mode is the best mode. But contrary to what many
people seem to think the ocaml-mode from the distribution is fine and
still maintained. You may want to give it a try.

Best,

Daniel