From: Shivkumar Chandrasekaran <shiv@ece.ucsb.edu>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:49:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A348F1A8-5FBB-11D7-B007-000393942C76@ece.ucsb.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030326083345.GA2985@iliana>
Is there a simple work-around for now that I could do. Something like:
cd /usr/local/lib/ocaml/camlimages
ocamlc -pack camlimages.cmo *.cmo
???? I am guessing this will not cut it. Thanks,
--shiv--
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 12:33 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 09:25:48AM +0100, Alessandro Baretta wrote:
>>
>> Shivkumar Chandrasekaran wrote:
>>> I observed that both camlimages and labltk have a module
>> named "Image".
>>> Any idea how I can get both to co-exist? Thanks.
>>
>>
>> This is a problem that comes up every so often: module
>> namespace cluttering. Some time ago I had pointed a name
>> clash between the Meta module in findlib and in the dynlink
>> library. Namespace clashes are bound to come up now and then
>> until the caml team introduces a namespace construct in the
>> language.
>
> There is already the -pack option, and the right thing to solve this
> problem would be to build all libraries to make usage of it (if
> possible). So you would have a CamlImage.Image module and a
> Labltk.Image
> module, which work pretty well.
>
> Now, library writters just need to modify their build system to take
> advantage of it, starting by the INRIA released libraries, especially
> the ones provided by the ocaml tarball directly like labltk.
>
> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
>
--shiv--
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-26 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-25 19:33 Shivkumar Chandrasekaran
2003-03-26 8:25 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-26 8:33 ` Sven Luther
2003-03-26 9:00 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-26 10:50 ` Sven Luther
2003-03-26 11:24 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-26 11:38 ` Sven Luther
2003-03-26 19:08 ` Chris Hecker
2003-03-26 21:08 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-27 17:23 ` David Brown
2003-03-27 19:46 ` Chris Hecker
2003-03-28 5:33 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-28 5:35 ` David Brown
2003-03-28 14:10 ` Damien Doligez
2003-03-28 15:00 ` Sven Luther
2003-03-30 10:06 ` Damien Doligez
2003-03-30 10:38 ` Sven Luther
2003-04-01 14:14 ` [Caml-list] naming conflicts (was: camlimages vs. labltk) Damien Doligez
2003-04-01 15:05 ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2003-04-01 19:51 ` Chris Hecker
2003-04-08 10:33 ` Damien Doligez
2003-03-31 1:21 ` [Caml-list] camlimages vs. labltk Chris Hecker
2003-03-30 9:26 ` Alessandro Baretta
2003-03-26 18:49 ` Shivkumar Chandrasekaran [this message]
2003-03-26 10:48 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2003-03-26 10:55 ` Sven Luther
2003-03-26 14:10 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A348F1A8-5FBB-11D7-B007-000393942C76@ece.ucsb.edu \
--to=shiv@ece.ucsb.edu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox