From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42844BCAC for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 00:03:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j4SM3v6N013885 for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 00:03:57 +0200 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so287784wri for ; Sat, 28 May 2005 15:03:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CObTYTiwDHRTIlx3wf/v6kNCiA2aoNImKKLfgARKNGsbUatowKfsY/O2prt5RH+DFqQ/NjtU1wnJpBAjMgU6dVAK7mWFM+2ucxrfVPaTwFKw3ruOPE4aUbVYOeqRiJZYzNKyMG8zOGspJAMNSnr3Cq3Zg9h4tI/a1DJ94sOg6Do= Received: by 10.54.59.8 with SMTP id h8mr44368wra; Sat, 28 May 2005 15:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.17.36 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2005 15:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e008fda050528150346a169d3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 23:03:57 +0100 From: Benjamin Geer Reply-To: Benjamin Geer To: Jonathan Roewen Subject: Re: [Caml-list] include statement Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4298EACD.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 semantics:01 wrote:01 benjamin:01 benjamin:01 caml:02 ben:02 structure:04 inria:05 docs:05 components:06 describe:06 manual:07 manual:07 but:12 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On 28/05/05, Jonathan Roewen wrote: > Trying to google, but include is too common The manual would be a better place to start. > Can someone describe > the semantics of the include statement, See the section "Including the components of another structure" on this pag= e: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual019.html Ben