From: "Till Varoquaux" <till.varoquaux@gmail.com>
To: "Jean-Christophe Filliâtre" <Jean-Christophe.Filliatre@lri.fr>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault....
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:17:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d3ec8300711080717x7e64434dge09f65fbb8783815@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47332472.8030800@lri.fr>
>
> and I guess you mean in both bytecode and nativecode and without
> compiling with -unsafe, right?
>
Yes,
Of course -unsafe is out of the picture. Using unsafe functions
(String.unsafe-get etc...) will also disqualify your solution.
And I'll push it even further: using -rectypes counts as a penalty but
crashing the interpreter is a bonus.
Till
P.S. I forgot to give credit in my previous mail: the bug was found
with Stéphane Glondu and Jérôme Vouillon while trying to understand
scanf, however they should not be held responsible for this post .
Adam Chlipala pointed out this might be the record for a segfault in
Ocaml, giving me the idea of launching this contest...
>
> --
> Jean-Christophe Filliâtre
> http://www.lri.fr/~filliatr/
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-08 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-08 14:17 Till Varoquaux
2007-11-08 15:00 ` [Caml-list] " Jean-Christophe Filliâtre
2007-11-08 15:17 ` Till Varoquaux [this message]
2007-11-08 15:55 ` Adrien
2007-11-08 16:05 ` Alain Frisch
2007-11-08 16:30 ` Feature request (was Re: [Caml-list] Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault....) Martin Jambon
2007-11-08 18:23 ` Martin Jambon
2007-11-08 16:07 ` [Caml-list] Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault Jeremy Yallop
2007-11-08 16:11 ` Jeremy Yallop
2007-11-08 16:17 ` Till Varoquaux
2007-11-08 17:02 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2007-11-08 17:10 ` Till Varoquaux
2007-11-08 17:02 ` Pascal Zimmer
2007-11-08 17:12 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-11-08 17:11 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-11-08 17:13 ` Zheng Li
2007-11-08 17:55 ` [Caml-list] STOP (was: Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault) Xavier Leroy
2007-11-08 18:11 ` Tom Primožič
2007-11-08 18:23 ` [Caml-list] STOP Robert Fischer
2007-11-08 19:01 ` Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2007-11-08 18:31 ` [Caml-list] STOP (was: Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault) Till Varoquaux
2007-11-08 19:06 ` Oliver Bandel
2007-11-09 18:09 ` Pierre Weis
2007-11-10 14:32 ` OCaml's formatting libraries Bünzli Daniel
2007-11-10 14:58 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2007-11-10 15:43 ` Bünzli Daniel
2007-11-10 19:13 ` Jon Harrop
2007-11-13 9:22 ` Pierre Weis
2007-11-13 9:13 ` Pierre Weis
2007-11-13 8:53 ` Pierre Weis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d3ec8300711080717x7e64434dge09f65fbb8783815@mail.gmail.com \
--to=till.varoquaux@gmail.com \
--cc=Jean-Christophe.Filliatre@lri.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox