From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <till.varoquaux@gmail.com>
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8679FBBA7
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sun,  5 Feb 2006 17:40:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.194])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k15GewXi002908
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:40:59 +0100
Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id e2so506628ugf
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 08:40:56 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=Ggn7CWPUg2x/HDJixf8HK2yzV1pwaHi3jsdFMgubrvNEGQYrpM2v5q8obZIk0cE1mCVwoRh4Unsev+JMIETCN/r1NIOdzqR9p4GHOC1Ev7WCja5pz5bP4q8/cuq0zv7D0dZJY+WnT0KTGK9wibsyRPPxtQaoCknqVDS2OSBZa2U=
Received: by 10.48.244.4 with SMTP id r4mr953787nfh;
        Sun, 05 Feb 2006 08:40:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.48.4.15 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 08:40:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <9d3ec8300602050840ha03fcd2wf8a43bd7a09732f2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:40:56 +0100
From: Till Varoquaux <till.varoquaux@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Curried form different from "normal"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 43E62A9A.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; curried:01 buffer:01 buffer:01 buf:01 buf:01 cheers:01 functions:01 caml:02 blank:97 blank:97 puzzled:02 string:02 string:02 let:03 let:03 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.0.3

I can across something that puzzled me while develloping a caml application=
:

Using:
 let non_blank_string=3D
      if !is_first then
=09trailling:=3DBuffer.contents white
      else
=09Buffer.add_buffer buf white;
      Buffer.reset white;
      is_first:=3Dfalse;
      Buffer.add_string buf

instead of

 let non_blank_string s=3D
      if !is_first then
=09trailling:=3DBuffer.contents white
      else
=09Buffer.add_buffer buf white;
      Buffer.reset white;
      is_first:=3Dfalse;
      Buffer.add_string buf s

Doesn't yeld the same results (the former is buggy). Now, as I
understand, these two functions should be exactly equivalent. I am
misunderstanding something here?

Cheers,

Till Varoquaux