From: Dario Teixeira <dario.teixeira@nleyten.com>
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] ZeroMQ vs Nanomsg
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:59:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ab1f1de347c6531e51d0757e140a49c@nleyten.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm evaluating ZeroMQ and Nanomsg for the middleware of a distributed
application. Now, I know both projects have had a fair share of drama
in the past, to the point that it's hard for an outside observer to be
up-to-date on the *current* strengths and weaknesses of each one.
Still,
it's my understanding that though ZeroMQ is more established, Nanomsg
was
developed later by one of the original authors of ZeroMQ, and supposedly
fixes some of the architectural mistakes of ZeroMQ. To complicate
matters,
Nanomsg's author quit the project a while ago, leaving it in limbo for
a while. In the meantime, it seems development has picked up again, and
Nanomsg recently had its 1.0 release.
Anyway, I'm sure the picture I painted above is incomplete. Therefore,
I would be much obliged to hear your opinions and experiences with
either
project. I will be using the OCaml bindings, obviously, so the maturity
of
the bindings is also a factor. (On first glance they seem quite
complete
and both offer support for LWT, which is a must.)
Thanks in advance for your time!
Kind regards,
Dario Teixeira
next reply other threads:[~2016-07-15 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-15 10:59 Dario Teixeira [this message]
2016-07-15 11:25 ` Simon Cruanes
2016-07-15 13:36 ` Dario Teixeira
2016-07-15 11:37 ` SP
2016-07-15 13:42 ` Dario Teixeira
2016-07-15 13:47 ` Hezekiah M. Carty
2016-07-15 15:58 ` Dario Teixeira
2016-07-15 16:22 ` Daniel Bünzli
2016-07-15 16:52 ` Hezekiah M. Carty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9ab1f1de347c6531e51d0757e140a49c@nleyten.com \
--to=dario.teixeira@nleyten.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox