From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91123BC6C for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:07:30 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAOJ2NEfAXQImh2dsb2JhbACPAgIBCAop X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,397,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="4082826" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2007 00:07:30 +0100 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lA9N7TLR026552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:07:29 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAIt2NEfRVYC5mGdsb2JhbACPAgIBAQcEBBMY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,397,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="4259477" Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.185]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2007 00:07:29 +0100 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id z22so760432fkz for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:07:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=St8jwTrhGr435Eyb+MB3FcSPHIkUvPiDMZX+rAJl/20=; b=nGCsZK7b1wm3AuIif3lE7qbIjGflaMQyma8j9IqwFUX+4l9XHKPa5qrr/YiX/jZE+nIEEzWQ90E4ni6acCg6uFmv9Cpobs24lBqxr9R1FMa9afD4EegOeYivFZAW8qGZxMyzdtGV1SiGl6NTdT6Oixsrj73LJrwUxH24ma7l6Pw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=b33iUOxc6uFloM6U7LRO24e+wisEAuJ3AQ6PTMTdVpSPoywPAGSpzFR+msFDkgV3WHDvy0asjiV7xOm5LQgDVeWW/figkzXyRbbjl7NDGBXOM4bl5LeA7spIUn3W1XHsTgttlBtweo072KpXrU0vqXarbSDlsmwj3hZeciHkkGw= Received: by 10.82.154.12 with SMTP id b12mr5085502bue.1194649648446; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:07:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.34? ( [83.36.87.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f4sm529629nfh.2007.11.09.15.07.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:07:26 -0800 (PST) Cc: Gerd Stolpmann , Mika Illouz , caml-list Message-Id: <9ED9BF56-2719-4BAA-81CF-29E36C4A5C54@gmail.com> From: Joel Reymont To: Edgar Friendly In-Reply-To: <4734E3E9.3040501@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v912) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wink releases caching library Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 23:07:22 +0000 References: <1194640344.19355.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4734E3E9.3040501@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.912) X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 4734E831.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caching:01 ocaml:01 2007,:98 edgar:98 interrupts:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 library:03 long:06 pointing:06 comparing:11 think:13 question:13 but:14 wonder:14 On Nov 9, 2007, at 10:49 PM, Edgar Friendly wrote: > I can't find any OCaml client for memcached. If noone interrupts me > by > pointing out a client that google didn't find, I think I'll go ahead > and > write one and see about comparing Cache with memcached. That's the essence of my question. I assume it wouldn't have taken long to write a memcached client but Wink chose to write a less featured memcached of their own. I really wonder why. -- http://wagerlabs.com