From: "David Allsopp" <dra-news@metastack.com>
To: "OCaml List" <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: Value shadowing
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:54:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9E2C98C8798A487DAE77F20A9DC4F1E8@countertenor> (raw)
[ There's been at least one recent(ish) discussion on this - [1] ]
Suppose I have this piece of code:
let foo xs =
match xs with
x::xs -> if x
then xs (* Return the tail of the list *)
else xs (* Return the entire list *)
| [] -> raise Exit
Now, the comments show what's supposed to happen in this function but that's
obviously not how it will behave because the entire list [xs] on line 1 is
shadowed by the tail of the list [xs] on line 3 so in both cases the tail of
the list will be returned. The type checker can do nothing as both have type
[bool list].
What would general opinion be if OCaml were to have a warning in this
instance - "[xs] on line 3 shadows [xs] on line 1 with the same type"?
As noted in the thread below, I too find
let x = _
in
let x = _
in
...
a useful style and would be greatly irritated by a warning on all shadowing
- but I think that in most cases for me the type of each [x] is different.
I've been stung a couple of times recently by non-contrived versions of the
function [foo] (through careless coding, of course - but that's what
warnings and type-checkers are about otherwise we'd all be using BCPL!)
Thoughts?
David
[1]
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2007/02/f60c7ea8cc0ebdbf9d1d5
6f0623b45a2.en.html
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-13 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-13 8:54 David Allsopp [this message]
2008-08-13 9:15 ` [Caml-list] " Brighten Godfrey
2008-08-13 9:56 ` David Allsopp
2008-08-13 10:49 ` [Caml-list] Value shadowing (tangent) Brighten Godfrey
2008-08-13 11:04 ` David Allsopp
2008-08-13 11:04 ` Brighten Godfrey
2008-08-13 11:17 ` Daniel Bünzli
2008-08-13 23:05 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2008-08-13 23:33 ` Daniel Bünzli
2008-08-13 11:05 ` Vincent Hanquez
2008-08-16 20:02 ` Pierre Etchemaïté
2008-08-17 8:07 ` David Allsopp
2008-08-17 10:28 ` Pierre Etchemaïté
2008-08-13 10:33 ` [Caml-list] Value shadowing Jim Farrand
2008-08-13 10:12 ` Richard Jones
2008-08-13 11:04 ` David Allsopp
2008-08-13 12:26 ` blue storm
2008-08-13 15:03 ` Mauricio Fernandez
2008-08-13 11:50 ` blue storm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9E2C98C8798A487DAE77F20A9DC4F1E8@countertenor \
--to=dra-news@metastack.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox