From: Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] float pretty-printing precision, once more.
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:09:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97FCFA94-0C40-11D7-B751-0003930FCE12@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1039475060.3df52174c32a4@imp.pro.proxad.net>
On Tuesday, Dec 10, 2002, at 00:04 Europe/Paris,
jeanmarc.eber@lexifi.com wrote:
> caml 3.06+1:
[string_of_float loses precision on floating-point numbers]
In the current working version (3.06+18), the precision used by
string_of_float has been increased to 17 digits. I *think* this
is enough to represent all the double-precision floating-point
numbers:
Objective Caml version 3.06+18 (2002-11-07)
# let f = 1. /. 86400.;;
val f : float = 1.1574074074074073e-05
# let s = string_of_float f;;
val s : string = "1.1574074074074073e-05"
# let f1 = float_of_string s;;
val f1 : float = 1.1574074074074073e-05
# f1 = f;;
- : bool = true
# f1 -. f;;
- : float = 0.
However, it has the unfortunate side-effect of revealing this
awful truth about FP numbers: many "interesting" numbers are
impossible to represent in floating-point. For example:
# 0.1;;
- : float = 0.10000000000000001
There is no floating-point number equal to 0.1 and the
best approximation you can get is 0.10000000000000001.
I expect this will quickly become a much-used FAQ entry...
I don't know if we will keep this change for the next release
of O'Caml. But you can always use (Printf.sprintf "%.17g")
instead of string_of_float, and you'll get all the digits,
significant or not.
-- Damien
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-10 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-09 23:04 jeanmarc.eber
2002-12-09 23:46 ` Yaron M. Minsky
2002-12-10 0:07 ` Brian Hurt
2002-12-10 2:13 ` David Chase
2002-12-10 9:49 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-12-10 13:09 ` Damien Doligez [this message]
2002-12-10 15:37 ` Jacques Carette
2002-12-10 15:47 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-12-11 4:03 ` David Chase
2002-12-12 1:41 ` David Chase
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97FCFA94-0C40-11D7-B751-0003930FCE12@inria.fr \
--to=damien.doligez@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox