Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: christo@nextsolution.co.jp (Frank Christoph)
To: e-posse@uniandes.edu.co
Cc: caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Subject: Re: Pattern Matching
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 18:20:31 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9609060920.AA00629@sparc3.nextsolution.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <322F0B89.553@isis.uniandes.edu.co> (message from Ernesto Posse on Thu, 05 Sep 1996 12:19:05 -0500)


> I have a question about pattern matching. I need a function which 
> binds an identifier to a value in certain data structure (which is
> called "heap" here). This is actually a (string * record) list. It is
> not suppose to be a mutable data structure, so the binding just creates
> a
> new list copying the same values as the old one with the exception of
> the
> record to be changed. For this purpose I am using List.map (I am using
> O'Caml 1.01 for Windows 95):

 ...

> However the compiler tells me that line marked (* 1 *) is an unused case
> of the match expression. I thought that maybe the problem was that the
> inner id variables (the ones in the function passed to map) are
> identifier
> patterns therefor they are different from the parameter of the assign
> function.

  There is no equality relationship between pattern variables and identifiers
in enclosing scopes unless you make it explicit with a boolean guard.

> So I tried to fix it like this:

> let assign heap id obj = 
>   List.map
>     ( function 
>         (name,{ vartype = vt; contents = v; 
>                 constraints = c; dependencies = d }) 
>           when name = id -> 
>             (name,{ vartype = vt; contents = obj; 
>                     constraints = c; dependencies = d })
>       | (name,_) as r when name <> id -> r )
>     heap

> And now I get the warning "this pattern-matching is not exhaustive".

  It's probably because the compiler doesn't know that ((x = y) or (x <> y))
is always true.  The following function definition also generates a complaint:

#let f = function x when x = 1 -> x | x when x <> 1 -> x+1;;
Warning: this pattern-matching is not exhaustive
val f : int -> int = <fun>

  In every compiler I know of, patterns are matched sequentially.  So if you
drop the guard and change the second match to:

 (name,_) as r -> r

it should compile without a warning and have the same semantics, unless you
add a new match case.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frank Christoph                 Next Solution Co.      Tel: 0424-98-1811
christo@nextsolution.co.jp                             Fax: 0424-98-1500


  parent reply	other threads:[~1996-09-06 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1996-09-05 17:19 Ernesto Posse
1996-09-06  8:17 ` Pierre Weis
1996-09-06  9:20 ` Frank Christoph [this message]
1997-05-01 13:34 stderr David Monniaux
1997-05-06 14:03 ` pattern matching Olivier Montanuy
1997-05-06 19:59   ` Stefan Monnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9609060920.AA00629@sparc3.nextsolution.co.jp \
    --to=christo@nextsolution.co.jp \
    --cc=caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr \
    --cc=e-posse@uniandes.edu.co \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox