From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D14AA7F61E
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:10:23 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AJtYapRBk+0mtSXtPVIYPUyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6Af?=
 =?us-ascii?q?oPdwSP75ocbcNUDSrc9gkEXOFd2CrakV16yL6uu8CSRAuc/H6y9SNsQUFlcsso?=
 =?us-ascii?q?Y/oU8JOIa9E0r1LfrnPWQRPf9pcxtbxUy9KlVfA83kZlff8TWY5D8WHQjjZ0Iu?=
 =?us-ascii?q?frymUqabtcm81viz9pvPeE0IwWPlOfIhZCmx+CHWq8gNyaRvMaw80AeB9n9PZu?=
 =?us-ascii?q?VNg2xlPliehQrU4cy5+Zp76SMWsPUkoZ1uS6L/KogxS71VCAMMp2Yn4Myj4RXK?=
 =?us-ascii?q?SwqC4j0WT2gQgB5JKwXf9hjmX47sv23xtrwui2GhIcTqQOVsCnyZ5KBxRUqt0X?=
 =?us-ascii?q?9fOg=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BmCADIUYdYe0pWN0peGwEBAQMBAQEJA?=
 =?us-ascii?q?QEBFgEBAQMBAQEJAQEBgwkBAQEBAYEChFmKe5EVlzuGIgKCXBMBAQEBAQEBAQE?=
 =?us-ascii?q?BARIBAQsLCgkdL4IzBAEWAQSCFwEFI1YQCxgCAiYCAkcQBhuJEgStWoIlilsBA?=
 =?us-ascii?q?QEBBgEBAQEBI4ELii+HTy6CMQWbTZNLAYhBD4Y+knc3gjeGOoZ4gU8BAQE?=
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BmCADIUYdYe0pWN0peGwEBAQMBAQEJAQEBFgEBAQMBAQE?=
 =?us-ascii?q?JAQEBgwkBAQEBAYEChFmKe5EVlzuGIgKCXBMBAQEBAQEBAQEBARIBAQsLCgkdL?=
 =?us-ascii?q?4IzBAEWAQSCFwEFI1YQCxgCAiYCAkcQBhuJEgStWoIlilsBAQEBBgEBAQEBI4E?=
 =?us-ascii?q?Lii+HTy6CMQWbTZNLAYhBD4Y+knc3gjeGOoZ4gU8BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,278,1477954800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="257116936"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Jan 2017 14:10:22 +0100
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (241.224.197.178.dynamic.wless.zhbmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch [178.197.224.241])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D7B21D0872;
	Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:10:20 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:10:18 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Louis Gesbert <louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr, Christophe Raffalli <christophe@raffalli.eu>
Message-ID: <95F3923189CB45DA86E8E5E6C127A6B1@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <4372910.SfsLsx3Fc8@agaric>
References: <20170123081914.khlfptehb33wmflf@delli7.univ-savoie.fr>
 <2754948.nqurzsgqqR@agaric>
 <1479F3A46A244541857BCDA472901816@erratique.ch>
 <4372910.SfsLsx3Fc8@agaric>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] type keyword indentation with tuareg

On Tuesday, 24 January 2017 at 14:00, Louis Gesbert wrote:
> `fun` does indeed get indented (by 2), as mentionned in the issue you linked to.

Ah sorry, it seems my mailer is lying to me; it wasn't showing the indent of your message which I now see by looking at the source.

D