From: Warren Harris <warren@metaweb.com>
To: OCaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: lazy vs fun
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:57:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94AD5806-B6F6-44F7-AA3C-1E63B6C1A722@metaweb.com> (raw)
Is there any advantage to using lazy evaluation in ocaml rather than
just using thunks to defer evaluation? E.g.
let x = lazy (3+4)
let y = Lazy.force x
vs:
let x = fun () -> 3+4
let y = x ()
Perhaps it's just that the type int lazy_t is more informative than
unit -> int?
Warren
next reply other threads:[~2009-08-24 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-24 21:57 Warren Harris [this message]
2009-08-24 22:04 ` [Caml-list] " Jake Donham
2009-08-24 22:15 ` Warren Harris
2009-08-24 22:18 ` Jake Donham
2009-08-24 22:06 ` Stéphane Glondu
2009-08-24 22:19 ` Martin Jambon
2009-08-24 23:11 ` Martin Jambon
2009-08-24 23:33 ` Warren Harris
2009-08-25 5:19 ` rixed
2009-08-25 6:29 ` David Allsopp
2009-08-25 18:09 ` rixed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94AD5806-B6F6-44F7-AA3C-1E63B6C1A722@metaweb.com \
--to=warren@metaweb.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox