From: Xavier Leroy <xavier@Theory.Stanford.EDU>
To: Chet.Murthy@inria.fr
Cc: caml-list@margaux
Subject: Re: Humpf ... chaines des caracteres sont bien efficace!
Date: Wed, 26 May 1993 15:11:30 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9305262211.AA00904@Tamuz.Stanford.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21515.737914251@margaux.inria.fr> from "Chet.Murthy@inria.fr" at May 20, 93 06:10:51 pm
> Est-il le cas qu'on fait qqchose de tres intelligent pour les tables
> de hachage en caml-light, surtout pour les caracteres?
Non, rien de particulierement astucieux, mais les fonctions de base
sur les chaines de caracteres (comparaisons, blit_string, hachage)
sont ecrites en C, donc relativement efficace par-rapport a du code
Caml Light. J'imagine que ca explique pourquoi tu n'as pas constate
d'acceleration importante.
- Xavier
prev parent reply other threads:[~1993-05-27 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1993-05-24 7:43 murthy
1993-05-26 22:11 ` Xavier Leroy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9305262211.AA00904@Tamuz.Stanford.EDU \
--to=xavier@theory.stanford.edu \
--cc=Chet.Murthy@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@margaux \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox