From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA26BBC4 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:58:23 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArMBAEfd0EnRVd14m2dsb2JhbACVRj8BAQEBAQgJCgkRpiyBB44VAQMBA4N3Bg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,448,1233529200"; d="scan'208";a="37526028" Received: from mail-qy0-f120.google.com ([209.85.221.120]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2009 23:58:23 +0200 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so3945898qyk.1 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:58:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IRl5JwsKZnxOYpEtWOwAhThsLVC37Cp0aqiB/CG+Vr0=; b=edQegkVaENsorJYRXun/fMvptMImtTfCxYaRzSXac+0gY3dQi/BDKe2KpvBuahL2Bm 1UHmQNTlYGVX8ek4fzoHtrT4L4ECxGJs1skwipz6SWEDbyDItD5ABBgavsutc5kcNTT7 B9M8UmFI6yN5wFgW21/YKYd0ud5aIpbi0Ju0g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wp0jkm7kbxox7HjEyauq/S7qVWvJMq0LEUkSYDA5ktkIFMo8MjPaFbIjEw1/GdPvQu ATpCfckuelFhxfLbqBOWEOC8+Ok5LXBTs1UwESyVppk67hWE1AeaybQbxOseh8pftjmU /znf1svoSayf/CM+p+kG0itw5gnjWpSFrZw0M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.83.138 with SMTP id f10mr2226856qcl.17.1238450302636; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:58:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0DEB4DD9-13C5-4CC5-A916-A18BB6B9DAEB@gmail.com> References: <0DEB4DD9-13C5-4CC5-A916-A18BB6B9DAEB@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:58:22 -0700 Message-ID: <91a2ba3e0903301458x1ed421dcicccd3db34c048c43@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] when OO is wrong From: Raoul Duke To: Alexy Khrabrov Cc: OCaml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; conceptually:01 summarize:01 pvr:98 caml-list:01 simpler:05 technically:09 ucl:09 wrong:10 folks:12 www:84 modeling:20 which:22 when:22 makes:23 what:24 > What is it about FP which makes modeling simpler than OO, conceptually and > technically? How can folks summarize their "enlightenment" experiences in > this regard? it is worth seeing http://www.info.ucl.ac.be/~pvr/book.html