From: "Raoul Duke" <raould@gmail.com>
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Where's my non-classical shared memory concurrency technology?
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 15:37:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91a2ba3e0805191537g7fec02f9h7c46aa1be4b92270@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b903a8570805191524n4b23b6e9v8a834d4f8ff826de@mail.gmail.com>
> If the answer is STM, please show me some non-trivial application that
> uses it, preferably
> in an impure language.
yes, that would be interesting to see. presumably the example would
have to come from Haskell, Clojure, or classically some SQL database?
i am under the impression that STM is harder to optimize since
generally you don't know what the transactions collided on. whereas
with a "hot lock" you can see precisely what code uses that lock and
what it locks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-19 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-18 8:39 Berke Durak
2008-05-18 16:35 ` Jon Harrop
2008-05-19 11:45 ` [Caml-list] " Martin Berger
2008-05-19 12:24 ` Berke Durak
2008-05-19 21:47 ` Jon Harrop
2008-05-19 22:24 ` Berke Durak
2008-05-19 22:37 ` Raoul Duke [this message]
2008-05-20 0:04 ` Pierre-Evariste Dagand
2008-05-20 21:27 ` David Teller
2008-05-21 7:52 ` Martin Berger
2008-05-21 8:06 ` Martin Berger
2008-05-19 14:09 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-05-19 16:30 ` Richard Jones
2008-05-19 18:26 ` Jon Harrop
2008-05-20 7:40 ` Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
2008-05-21 8:18 ` Martin Berger
2008-05-21 8:06 ` Martin Berger
2008-05-21 13:50 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-05-26 15:29 ` Damien Doligez
2008-05-26 16:08 ` Jon Harrop
2008-05-27 9:34 ` Martin Berger
2008-05-28 11:18 ` Damien Doligez
2008-05-28 12:16 ` Jon Harrop
2008-05-28 17:41 ` Martin Berger
2008-05-29 12:02 ` Frédéric Gava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91a2ba3e0805191537g7fec02f9h7c46aa1be4b92270@mail.gmail.com \
--to=raould@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox