From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9913BBC69 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:59:44 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAK7gWEfRVca6kmdsb2JhbACPVwIBAQcCBhMW X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.23,267,1194217200"; d="scan'208";a="6585948" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2007 14:59:44 +0100 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lB7DxgSK030618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:59:44 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAK7gWEfRVca6kmdsb2JhbACPVwIBAQcCBhMW X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.23,267,1194217200"; d="scan'208";a="6585947" Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.186]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2007 14:59:43 +0100 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so632366rvb for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:59:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=QaemDPhnz6CdUBCZ9F8729+elwuOKay9dFAb9umY7lo=; b=HWy4H77c2yu3H/BJ5RaF/f/nmneDS5YtraCR/JlH6QyptRaLTlgcevBUAvxaoihOfQls1tFwCHZjmjFDdSjc0qvIrYtcsCQRsgcEijl0k8LaLuoDEZsI0P6iIVArwXo1JyCu4MozUy3sYfH8m5yqr/LWrIS7FhRdgBoEU9aZYWQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Ai1E0+C3PLEB7hmUBWrFRCvZlvkJg67OjpefZMTGXSsovYoG+He/61gPsu4J9xrtx4/bKt/e6/GDQqFiSpFb+cL67x+gIT239cEsI+rAAmXQ49M/aF65ttVr6/wdWlyNZBd6LD5PB17seBl793cUzRQCSLFcHrigib+V8vNiXc4= Received: by 10.141.22.1 with SMTP id z1mr2671891rvi.1197035982372; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:59:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.200.16 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 05:59:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <90823c940712070559i5c435a10l76bbb3ec328690aa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 16:59:42 +0300 From: "Dmitry Bely" To: ocaml Subject: Class runtime representation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 475951CE.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; runtime:01 ocaml:01 runtime:01 hash:01 computed:01 dmitry:01 dmitry:01 bely:01 bely:01 curious:09 tag:13 should:13 enough:14 method:17 method:17 Just curious: why Ocaml runtime should know class method names? Why the method tag (a hash value computed from the name) is not enough? - Dmitry Bely