From: "Dave Berry" <Dave@kal.com>
To: "Xavier Leroy" <xavier.leroy@inria.fr>,
"Christopher Quinn" <cq@htec.demon.co.uk>, <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:14:54 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8E31D6933A2FE64F8AE3CC1381EEDCE72A0A3E@NT.kal.com> (raw)
I don't have figures for this, unfortunately. I believe the TIL folks
use this technique to keep the size of their type information
manageable; possibly they have some measurements.
I can offer two anecdotal examples. Way back when the Edinburgh CS
department did all its teaching on one multi-user machine with about 8M
RAM, the Edinburgh ML implementation was quite unusable because the
top-level rapidly grew too large. Hash-consing made it manageable, with
no appreciable loss of performance.
I believe Harlequin's implementation of Dylan also introduced
hash-consing to reduce the size of the program databases (among other
tricks). This increased performance by reducing thrashing.
It's always hard to predict how much effect a given technique will have
in a given situation. In practice someone would have to implement it
and measure the effect.
-----Original Message-----
From: Xavier Leroy [mailto:xavier.leroy@inria.fr]
Sent: 21 March 2002 18:13
To: Christopher Quinn
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml
> Any idea how much improvement would come from hash-consing,
> as Dave Berry suggested? And only that part of a module's
> signature which pertained to actual usage would need
> inclusion, no? And only of those modules externally provided
> upon which one's project depends, ie. the standard library,
> not the internal project modules?
No idea. It's certainly possible to reduce the size of the signature
information that has to be retained; how much and at what cost, I
don't know.
- Xavier Leroy
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives:
http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ:
http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next reply other threads:[~2002-03-22 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-22 10:14 Dave Berry [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-22 10:24 Dave Berry
2002-03-11 4:28 Mark D. Anderson
2002-03-11 7:12 ` Mattias Waldau
2002-03-11 12:15 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-03-12 0:19 ` Jeff Henrikson
2002-03-12 22:00 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-03-20 11:20 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-03-20 11:43 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-03-20 17:16 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-03-20 12:53 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-03-20 13:05 ` Johan Georg Granström
2002-03-20 13:40 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-03-20 19:46 ` Alain Frisch
2002-03-20 20:39 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-03-20 21:16 ` Markus Mottl
2002-03-21 9:07 ` Warp
2002-03-21 10:18 ` Christopher Quinn
2002-03-21 18:13 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-03-21 14:13 ` Jeff Henrikson
2002-03-21 18:10 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-03-21 18:39 ` Sven
2002-03-21 19:22 ` james woodyatt
2002-03-21 19:43 ` Jeff Henrikson
2002-03-22 2:02 ` Brian Rogoff
2002-03-22 10:11 ` Warp
2002-03-21 18:50 ` Sven
2002-03-02 0:11 [Caml-list] troubleshooting problem related to garbage collection james woodyatt
2002-03-02 7:57 ` [Caml-list] The DLL-hell of O'Caml Mattias Waldau
2002-03-02 11:56 ` Markus Mottl
2002-03-02 21:40 ` Alexander V. Voinov
2002-03-02 14:46 ` Alain Frisch
2002-03-02 19:00 ` Chris Hecker
2002-03-02 19:42 ` Mattias Waldau
2002-03-02 22:41 ` Chris Hecker
2002-03-03 15:56 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-03-04 9:57 ` Sven
2002-03-04 12:20 ` Jacques Garrigue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8E31D6933A2FE64F8AE3CC1381EEDCE72A0A3E@NT.kal.com \
--to=dave@kal.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=cq@htec.demon.co.uk \
--cc=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox